reviews for City AT are not good ...
although 98 hp on paper but maaany people and fellow members have called it underpowered due to less available torque at lowrr rpms ... and fuel efficiency is not very good either 10-11.5 kpl with in city drive
so you will very less happy customers/users for City AT on the forum also
on thr othet hand Honda City manual is entirely a different story ... it seems powerful, agile and most fuel efficient of any 1300 cc cars availablw in the market ..
although both are same vehicle but there is huge difference between the drive and user satisfaction of HONDA CITY AT and Honda City manual ..
I am one thr happy owners of Honda City manual.
coming towards Gli AT .. have you seen its 0-100 kph timings ??? although it is not related in a sedan intended to daily commute but let me tell you that it takes 18 secs to dash from 0 to 100 kph
just to set the perspective Toyota Vitz with 1000cc , 3 cylinder tiny engine takes 14 secs ... to reach hundred.
these are official toyota figures ..they just released the tests results for GLI AT
1.3 GLI AT will be a disappointing chapter with mere 82 hp and 1700 kg to carry with 4-5 ppl onboard. Current gen GLI AT with 1.6ltr DUAL VVTi is sufficiently powered though
so if I was you I'd stay away from both vehicles ... sorry but that is just how I feel ...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2