I have also driven both and have different opinion, the comparison of both cars is valid only because both are in similar price bracket, v2 is a better car overall. interior quality isn't as bad, the color of plastic makes it look bad, the material used is of good quality and it is better than many old model 660cc cars, though not as good as wagon r or swift. the leg space is good, the posture of wagon r(though i like wagon r), santro and other 660cc cars is too upright for my taste.(closer to three wheelers than cars). fuel average is a compromise but still better than vitz and passo 1.0(the way i drive i can do better if the car isn't underpowered vs how cvt lovers drive to get fuel economy by staying in left lane and waiting for speed to rise eventually). comfort was similar to vitz, the seats provide better support for laid back driving style. engine & tranny are butter smooth(wagon r needs clutch cable adjustment right outta showroom) and provide powerful drive. it is successful in china(hence you can import a lot of goodies for it) and Africa. stable with stock tyres with no difference if driving in wind. the accessories and features provided aren't present even in gli, city.