Toyota Corolla 1.6 GLi Dual VVTi Automatic Car Reviews

1
Overall Rating

15 reviews
  • Style
  • 4-rating
  • Comfort
  • 4-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 4-rating
  • Performance
  • 4-rating
  • Value for money
  • 4-rating

Latest Toyota Corolla 1.6 GLi Dual VVTi Automatic Car Reviews

Sort By:
Displaying Reviews 1 - 10 of 14 in total
Toyota Corolla 1.6 GLi Dual VVTi Automatic User Review

GLI muscular look

2013 Toyota Corolla 1.6 GLi Dual VVTi Automatic

Posted by M SAEED SULEHRIA on Jul 29, 2013

Exterior:Very beautiful muscular look. No car in market has such dashing big look in this class of vehicle.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort):Less impressive if compare with Honda's car of same class.

Fuel Economy:

Ride Quality & Handling:

Final Words:Over all good car, parts are less expensive as compare to Honda's parts. Robust on Pakistani roads. Maintenance is cheaper.

Familiarity: I owned this car.
  • Style
  • 5-rating
  • Comfort
  • 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 4-rating
  • Performance
  • 4-rating
  • Value for money
  • 5-rating
Do you find this review helpful?
(2 out of 7 people found this review helpful)

Corolla Cruisetronic model is way better than Honda, Look at honda civic shape, its hopeless, And note the streamline body of civic which I think has been copied from Corolla, and was not in civic reborn model.

Let me add, Look at the Corolla 2014 model images on google and you all who are registered users of Pakwheels might got the email about 2014 Corolla. Its one sexy car and 1000 times much better in shape than any civic model that has been made till yet.

  • Style
  • 5-rating
  • Comfort
  • 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 5-rating
  • Performance
  • 5-rating
  • Value for money
  • 4-rating
Do you find this review helpful?
(2 out of 10 people found this review helpful)
Toyota Corolla 1.6 GLi Dual VVTi Automatic User Review

GLi Performance

2012 Toyota Corolla 1.6 GLi Dual VVTi Automatic

Posted by Zarneel Javed on May 07, 2013

Exterior:Exterior is normal

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort): Only basic characteristics in it no more features

Fuel Economy: Consume more fuel in city area

Ride Quality & Handling: No grip on road specially in muddy & wet road.

Final Words:
Overall it is a normal car and it's not provide facilities according to the money consumption.

Familiarity: I did not own this car, but have driven this car.
  • Style
  • 3-rating
  • Comfort
  • 1-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 2-rating
  • Performance
  • 3-rating
  • Value for money
  • 3-rating
Do you find this review helpful?
(1 out of 2 people found this review helpful)

Superb car.Much better than honda city 1.3 A/T.Good pick and good in resale.When i went somewhere its beauty attracts the people to see it.Its ABS and its road grip both are excellent.Its 1600cc is very good in running.i like this car very much much and i have a very good experience with this. SUPERB!!!!!

  • Style
  • 5-rating
  • Comfort
  • 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 5-rating
  • Performance
  • 5-rating
  • Value for money
  • 4-rating
Do you find this review helpful?
(6 out of 8 people found this review helpful)

Superb car.Much better than honda city 1.3 A/T.Good pick and good in resale.When i went somewhere its beauty attracts the people to see it.Its ABS and its road grip both are excellent.Its 1600cc is very good in running.i like this car very much much and i have a very good experience with this. SUPERB!!!!!

  • Style
  • 5-rating
  • Comfort
  • 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 5-rating
  • Performance
  • 5-rating
  • Value for money
  • 4-rating
Do you find this review helpful?
(1 out of 2 people found this review helpful)

Superb car.Much better than honda city 1.3 A/T.Good pick and good in resale.When i went somewhere its beauty attracts the people to see it.Its ABS and its road grip both are excellent.Its 1600cc is very good in running.i like this car very much much and i have a very good experience with this. SUPERB!!!!!

  • Style
  • 5-rating
  • Comfort
  • 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 5-rating
  • Performance
  • 5-rating
  • Value for money
  • 4-rating
Do you find this review helpful?
(2 out of 4 people found this review helpful)

It is over all a good car. The negative thing is shape, from Xli to Altis, you get the same shape. Like Honda, when you move from city to Civic, you get the different shape. Indus Motor Company really need to think about this. The most important thing which is missing from this variant is Keyless entry. :(

  • Style
  • 4-rating
  • Comfort
  • 4-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 5-rating
  • Performance
  • 4-rating
  • Value for money
  • 5-rating
Do you find this review helpful?
(3 out of 4 people found this review helpful)
Toyota Corolla 1.6 GLi Dual VVTi Automatic User Review

Super ECT.

Toyota Corolla 1.6 GLi Dual VVTi Automatic

Posted by adyiator gallagher on Mar 03, 2012

New corolla comes with lots of versions. 1.3L is underpowered, 1.8L consumes more fuel. But 1.6L Super ECT is best car in the corolla range. It has perfect balance of power and fuel economy. Plus Super ECT has smoother shifts, more fuel economy and delivers good performance, based on two modes, power and normal. To know more about Super ECT check this link: www.autoshop101.com/forms/h16.pdf

Moreover, this car was designed in Italy, and has more space and amazing looks, even better than Camry. Very balanced shape and comes with st... more Icn-expand Icn-expand

  • Style
  • 5-rating
  • Comfort
  • 4-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 4-rating
  • Performance
  • 5-rating
  • Value for money
  • 4-rating
Do you find this review helpful?
(3 out of 5 people found this review helpful)

This huge body should not have anything less than 1.6L

But what is the fault of people who preferred Altis for its 1.8L and a little variant design than Corolla ....

New Altis and 1.6 GLi are no different in their visual appearance and engine capacity, the feel of power for an Altis user is no more than a GLi user, then whats the use to pay more :(

  • Style
  • 0-rating
  • Comfort
  • 0-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 0-rating
  • Performance
  • 0-rating
  • Value for money
  • 0-rating
Do you find this review helpful?
(2 out of 5 people found this review helpful)

1.LOOKS=10/10
2.DRIVE=SMOOTH .....9/10
3.LUXURY AND COMFORT=MARVELLOUS...... 9.5/10
4.SUSPENSION=10/10
5.BRAKES=10/10
6-AC=10/10
7.ENGINE=COMPACT.....10/10
8.ROAD CLEARENCE=OUT STANDING....FULL LOADED...10/10
9.CAPACITY(SPACIOUS)=10/10
10.TRUNK=VERY SPACIOUS.
11.EPS(electronic power stearing)=10/10...ITS MALAAI YAR......
12.NEW THING....THAT ITS COMPUTERIZED.....ALL THE CALCULATIONS ABOUT SYSTEM AND EVERYTHING IS INQUIRED BY CAR'S "MASTER CHECK SYSTEM"....
13.VERY GOO... more Icn-expand Icn-expand

  • Style
  • 5-rating
  • Comfort
  • 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy
  • 5-rating
  • Performance
  • 5-rating
  • Value for money
  • 5-rating
Do you find this review helpful?
(8 out of 10 people found this review helpful)