Survey by Qualaroo
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 29 of 29
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: City 2003 VS mira/EK

  1. #1
    PakWheeler Follow
    kidincartown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Islamabad
    Posts
    18
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

  2. #21
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    Retaliator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rawalpindi
    Age
    8
    Posts
    1,445
    Follows
    4
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by margallar View Post
    i highly disagree, it looks better than the new cars, the new corolla looks like it has been stung by wasps because of its swollen body, the new city has curves that end sharply. the dashboard of both new cars is rock hard, made of low quality plastic, 200+ kilometers per cylinder (my cousin's city gives this mileage on long) thats very satisfactory
    I agree that the 2002 city was really good car in terms of everything but its a decade old car. And you have stated why it looks old: it doesnt have the styling that of the currently produced cars in its design. I own a similar year of manuf honda civic pros oriel and exactly know what kind of maint problems it can present.
    Keis are much fun to drive. More economical on petrol but are not suitable for every purpose.
    -

  3. #22
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    sheikhmunda97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Kasur
    Posts
    1,686
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    go for honda city 2004
    ALONE
    BUT HAPPY

  4. #23
    PakWheeler Follow
    heartbeat4045's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Lahore
    Age
    35
    Posts
    342
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    opt for city
    (*I*)
    --

  5. #24
    PakWheeler Follow
    kidincartown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Islamabad
    Posts
    18
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Question

    First thanx 2 all guys for valuable comments...

    Please correct if wrong;

    1-fuel consumption wise no such difference if we use City on CNG and 600 CC on petrol
    2-shape and space wise City has more points then 660
    3-@point2: 660 are quicker while running on rush road like to turning radius length etc
    4-City parts easy available but not others
    5-parts for both are costly means same on both ends
    6-2003 City parts are older means we go to mechanic more often then with 660 cc
    7-resale ...no idea about 660 cc..but city has
    8-demand price for City 2003 and 2006/07 660 are almost same

    any other point !!!!

  6. #25
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    Retaliator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rawalpindi
    Age
    8
    Posts
    1,445
    Follows
    4
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kidincartown View Post
    First thanx 2 all guys for valuable comments...

    Please correct if wrong;

    1-fuel consumption wise no such difference if we use City on CNG and 600 CC on petrol
    2-shape and space wise City has more points then 660
    3-@point2: 660 are quicker while running on rush road like to turning radius length etc
    4-City parts easy available but not others
    5-parts for both are costly means same on both ends
    6-2003 City parts are older means we go to mechanic more often then with 660 cc
    7-resale ...no idea about 660 cc..but city has
    8-demand price for City 2003 and 2006/07 660 are almost same

    any other point !!!!
    feels like I am marketing here EK but this is not the case. your pt two is half wrong. EK has equal / more space than a City. and even trunk is bigger than city with a CNG cylinder. far more comfortable as well.
    -

  7. #26
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    cooldevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Islamabad
    Posts
    3,047
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    city 2003 all the way! ull not regret even after using it for 5 more years! most of the spare parts are readily available at normal cost! it gives me more than 180km mileage in one full cylinder(50kg)! on petrol it does 14kmpl in city!luvin it!

  8. #27
    PakWheeler Follow
    Farukhz7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Islamabad
    Posts
    209
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kidincartown View Post
    First thanx 2 all guys for valuable comments...

    Please correct if wrong;

    1-fuel consumption wise no such difference if we use City on CNG and 600 CC on petrol
    2-shape and space wise City has more points then 660
    3-@point2: 660 are quicker while running on rush road like to turning radius length etc
    4-City parts easy available but not others
    5-parts for both are costly means same on both ends
    6-2003 City parts are older means we go to mechanic more often then with 660 cc
    7-resale ...no idea about 660 cc..but city has
    8-demand price for City 2003 and 2006/07 660 are almost same

    any other point !!!!
    1. City is even better with cng then 660cc on petrol obviously. Sometimes city used to give almost same milegae like mehran on cng. 140-150 in a cylinder and >180 on long.
    2. Shape is better , alot better, But the interior wise the 660cc has advantage they look more spacious.
    3. Yes
    4.Parts of city are easily available and not expensive at all.
    5. I have no idea of parts of 660 but parts of city are not much expensive.
    6. Yes
    7. City have great resale this 2000-2003 version one. But steadily the market for these 660cc cars are increasing and mark my words you wont sell your car on loss after a year or more.
    8. Extra clean and best condition 2002-3 exis may cost between 8-8.5 lacs. While you can get a 2k8-2k9 model 660 in this budget which is almost new.

  9. #28
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    Retaliator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rawalpindi
    Age
    8
    Posts
    1,445
    Follows
    4
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    state the purpose of buying? what are you looking for? how will you use it? discard it? if you know u can get the ans. otherwise try to test drive both.
    -

  10. #29
    PakWheeler Follow
    kidincartown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Islamabad
    Posts
    18
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    want 2 use as family car.. i'm looking for 2003 iDSI in good condition...can you please let me know about the price range to buy this. thnx in advance

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •