Almost the same
Sent from my HTC Desire
What is the fuel consumption of City 1.3 Automatic?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using PW Forums mobile app
13 in city 15 -16 highway19-20 max economy on highway
Sent from my GT-I9500 using PW Forums mobile app
I too think the facelift has more clearance
///AMG
Do anyone have service / workshop repair manual for Honda city 2000-2003?
13 in city if driven carefully. 22 kmpl is possible on downslopes only and is thus unrealistic.
How does that compare to 1.5l auto?
The above table shows the saving we get for a single mileage increase considering daily usage of car. As you can see that we can only save Rs 800 per month if we drive car for more than 75 kms daily (26 days) if we increase its mileage with 1km. This concludes that people who are driving less than 75kms need not to worry about mileage of their cars as the saving amount is not significant. Therefore for 90% of the people mileage is not relevant factor. Its the driving comfort and road clearance. Therefore feel free to install 195/65 size tires on Honda City as this will impact only Rs 500 monthly for average user, but the quality of ride will improve considerably.
Here CONS is Consumption or Mileage per litre.
Do you have 2 lacs extra to spend on 1.5 auto??
If yes, then you should have those extra bucks for fuel as well.
Anyways,For 1.5 city auto...
12 local14-15 higway17-18 feather light highway
There will be not much difference. If you do not have some marketing type work which require lot of driving, dont worry about 12 or 13. Some of friends with civic telling about 11-13 /L in city driving and it is with 1.8 engine. Saquib has given above a very realistic view of savings. If you have budget try to go for 1.5L car especially aspire one. It will gives you not only driving fun but also better resale value. 1.3 engine is under power for automatic transmission and with AC on you will feel trouble because you dont have clutch to control the power. In my personal opinion I can sacrifice the savings on better driving.
Why 1.3 L giving low average than 1.5 L.As we bought 1.3 L so we can have more fuel efficiency.
Average of 1.3 is higher.
Enjoying scan gauge in my city idsi
I am stuck between City 1.5l Aspire manual and automatic transmission selection. Is automatic transmission suitable for going to mountain resorts like Muree, Nathia Gali, Kashmir, Karakoram Highway, etc?
If you live in murree buy 1.5L. If you visit it once in a blue moon buy automatic.
As far as can 1.3L go to hill stations? yes.
I have 1.3L manual but I am planning to change it to 1.5L automatic (But if new model comes) . Normally automatic transmission also has an option for steep hills (Named as D1, D2, B etc along with normal drive mode D). I dont know about Uplift model but older one has it. If any body can update us about gear options available in 1.5 Automatic it will be appreciable because in my city there is no Honda showroom. In VIENNA people prefer automatic transmission even there is also lot of Hill driving.
Is the 4th year warranty extension of any use?
What about Modulo kit and utility package? How is the quality and fit and finish of it vs outside market jobs? And what is the typical cost of both from market?
I meant can 1.5l Prosmatec go to hill stations and other tough terrain like Karakoram Highway areas?
What are the gear ratios of City 1.5l manual and Prosmatec transmissions?
plz share details