Survey by Qualaroo
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33
Like Tree5Likes

Thread: Fuel Consumption: Honda City M/T vs Honda City A/T (1300 cc)

  1. #1
    PakWheeler Follow
    maan86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lahore
    Age
    30
    Posts
    8
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default Fuel Consumption: Honda City M/T vs Honda City A/T (1300 cc)

    AA everyone,

    I tried to look for a related post but didn't find any so apologies if this topic is already present.

    I'm planning to buy Honda City A/T 1.3 but a city A/T owner confused me the other day. According to him, his city does 8 KM/Liter in City and 12 KM/L on highway. This consumption is too bad as City M/T does around 15 KM/L in city i guess.

    Can anyone please clarify it with authentic consumption of both cars? Thanks in advance

    regards,
    abdul


  2. #2
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    cooldevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Islamabad
    Posts
    3,047
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    yes its true! my 2 friends have city, one has auto and the other one owns a manual . manual city does 14kml and auto gives 9-10kmpl in city driving

  3. #3
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    speedster_101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Islamabad
    Posts
    3,447
    Follows
    2
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    1
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    True it is. City A/T doesn't give good mileage.
    "The more we sweat in peace, the less we bleed in war"

  4. #4
    PakWheeler Follow
    maan86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lahore
    Age
    30
    Posts
    8
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Thank you both of you. Fuel consumption is the major factor and i'll definitely consider it. Thanks again.

  5. #5
    PakWheeler Follow
    Ayieshausman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Lahore
    Posts
    13
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Yes I own a city at and it gives mileage of Max 9 in city .however on open.roads like ring road it gives 12 /l

  6. #6
    PakWheeler Follow
    maan86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lahore
    Age
    30
    Posts
    8
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    yeah, i'll go for manual probably. Thanks a lot.

  7. #7
    PakWheeler Follow
    dexter1377's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Sialkot
    Age
    28
    Posts
    348
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    I just drove 129 kms from lahore to sialkot GT road on my new city 700kms driven when i reached home the avg was 18.7km/pl

    I think it will get better after 5K service as right now idle city is on 1.2k rpm

  8. #8
    PakWheeler Follow
    ali051214's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Rawalpindi
    Age
    25
    Posts
    414
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dexter1377 View Post
    I just drove 129 kms from lahore to sialkot GT road on my new city 700kms driven when i reached home the avg was 18.7km/pl

    I think it will get better after 5K service as right now idle city is on 1.2k rpm
    You have a M/T ???

  9. #9
    PakWheeler Follow
    ali051214's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Rawalpindi
    Age
    25
    Posts
    414
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maan86 View Post
    AA everyone,

    I tried to look for a related post but didn't find any so apologies if this topic is already present.

    I'm planning to buy Honda City A/T 1.3 but a city A/T owner confused me the other day. According to him, his city does 8 KM/Liter in City and 12 KM/L on highway. This consumption is too bad as City M/T does around 15 KM/L in city i guess.

    Can anyone please clarify it with authentic consumption of both cars? Thanks in advance

    regards,
    abdul
    I got Aspire P/T 700 km driven
    And getting 8-9 km/l , in city with A.C
    It is true that Manual gives l
    More Mileage than auto,
    I wanted a Comfort so I traded for fuel, you should go for manual, its gonna give u a Good Fuel Consumption.

  10. #10
    PakWheeler Follow
    dexter1377's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Sialkot
    Age
    28
    Posts
    348
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Yup M/t

  11. #11
    PakWheeler Follow
    ali051214's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Rawalpindi
    Age
    25
    Posts
    414
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dexter1377 View Post
    Yup M/t
    Rite , enjoy d ride.n.econmy Bro.:-)

  12. #12
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    talhabinomar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lahore
    Age
    26
    Posts
    2,469
    Follows
    2
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    1
    Best Answers
    1
    Good Answers
    3

    Default

    In Manual Fuel Economy is target
    In Automatic Comfort is target so you have to give up the economy for your own comfort. Opportunity Cost Brother.

  13. #13
    PakWheeler Follow
    Oblivion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lahore
    Age
    40
    Posts
    631
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    My city 09 auto gives 10.7 to 11.3 in city while it touched 16.3 on long.

    Sent from my GT-N7100 using PW Forums mobile app

  14. #14
    PakWheeler Follow
    ali051214's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Rawalpindi
    Age
    25
    Posts
    414
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oblivion View Post
    My city 09 auto gives 10.7 to 11.3 in city while it touched 16.3 on long.

    Sent from my GT-N7100 using PW Forums mobile app
    You are rite, my P/T gave 9 km /l with A.C , but on a short trip to kalar kahar, it gave around 13.2 , and its still 890 km driven only.

    Point is Long route does give u Economy but in city drive its v less but that exactly d point you get Comfort on a cost as TALAH said above

  15. #15
    PakWheeler Follow
    maan86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lahore
    Age
    30
    Posts
    8
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Thanks again for the useful discussion.

  16. #16
    PakWheeler Follow
    waqar613's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Karachi
    Age
    30
    Posts
    273
    Follows
    1
    Following
    8
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cooldevil View Post
    yes its true! my 2 friends have city, one has auto and the other one owns a manual . manual city does 14kml and auto gives 9-10kmpl in city driving
    Salam Dear,

    need to confirm one thing about city 2010-2009 - manuel the patrol ave you've mention is 14km in city driving does it includes AC full time?
    or without AC.
    please clarify as i was about to purchase city 2010 next week.

  17. #17
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    cooldevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Islamabad
    Posts
    3,047
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    its with 75% ac use in city (islamabad). city MT has good fuel average but danda suspension! comfort level is bad! not normal but bad. i would have bought reborn or 1.6 altis instead of city! reborn does anything above 11-12 in isb , same as altis but one can enjoy the ride ateast

  18. #18
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    asim510's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Islamabad
    Age
    33
    Posts
    3,393
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    72 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    1
    Problems Solved
    1
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    1

    Default

    Damn........................ Damn, i never knew A/T has such a poor consumption. i own M/T and it give 15.5kmpl in Local and 17.5kmpl on Long
    Before you criticize someone, Make sure you are better than them.............

  19. #19
    PakWheeler Follow
    hammad352's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Karachi
    Posts
    10
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    0
    Problems Solved
    0
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    0

    Default

    1. M/T 2013
    2. City 10%, Highway 90% Driving
    3. AC (10%)
    4. Saada Petrol
    5. 15-16 km/l in City, 18 to 19 Km/l on highway
    6. 125000km Done. maintained throughout by Honda
    7. General Eurostar (Stock tyre size) changed 2 times (first time 35000 km, 2nd time 98000 km)
    8. Karachi

  20. #20
    Senior PakWheeler Follow
    hash737's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Islamabad
    Posts
    1,069
    Follows
    0
    Following
    2
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Problems Posted
    3
    Problems Solved
    1
    Best Answers
    0
    Good Answers
    1

    Default

    i am having different results though, P/T Transmission 1.5 aspire 60k driven and inside Islamabad average is 14.2.

    (The cluster has been restarted many times and same average is achieved)

    on long its around 17-19 km/L.



    Note that this 1.5 P/T City is used by my father who is noway near to being familiar to hypermilling.

    in islamabad you can't hyper mile anyways

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

User Tag List

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •