@ c12k and True eye.
i agree with BOTH of you........you both have pointed out some really valid points at your own place.
as far as i m concerned......m gonna be adequate about it.........not too much.........not too less........3 children is adequate i think.......dont have to fall below 2.11 to keep it rising
@ true eye
[quote] more population means less jobs/high unemployment rate leading to more crimes, less facilities, over-crowded cities, pollution, strained resources, hunger, poverty etc. etc [ /blockquote]
how abt luking at this the other way round
more population means MORe consumers ,....resulting in more business to be set up to meet the demand......more competetion therefore.....more earnings.....and so on...........but only in the absense of corruption it is possible...........look at the economic olevel of the most overly populated cities......like New york , London ,Dubai , Karachi could have been one of these cities if the positive impacts of oVer crowded cities were achived without corruption.
kher i did not mean to oppose you , you are right as well , all i meant to say this that EVERYTHING when seen from different diferent angles.
have ADVANTAGES , As well as DIsADVANTAGES.
but do not below 3 children