I can only laugh at you! You are simply out of words because your ignorant facts have been proved wrong.
Now read YOUR OWN POST WITH OPEN EYES!!!
You WROTE:
"If what u r saying is true then Mehran is in fact a very safe car, coz even a small hit dents the whole body, so yeah full marks there for mehran for being 'energy absorbent' in crashes!! Get ur facts right, cars that crumble easy have poor build quality, period. I agree that old corolla's and old cars in general were more robustly built and had more metal than plastic in them and as a result were more durable. New cars are better in safety coz they have things like airbags and other designs to make sure that passengers and esp driver is safe in accidents. But what we see here, the bashed up city, is not a sign of excellent quality control by honda, but it simply underlines the fact that old cars were built heavy and had less damage to body on impact. If there was a new corolla in city's place then it would too have been bashed likely, not because their build quality is bad, but because in a war or metal vs plastic, the metal always wins! Hope u get what i mean"
You are directly challenging the QUALIITY of Honda in above post just because City got MORE DENTS then the corolla which means that You FAIL to understand a fact that quality DONNOT means that car WILL NOT get a dent! Quality is that on impact the car will MINIMISE the force transferred inside the cabin. And DURABILITY has nothing to do with METAL body. Durability is that HOW LONG a component lasts whether its made up of Metal or Carbon fiber!
In the end, if you still MEANT something else, then it is YOU who has to REPAIR his/her English.