your argument is invalid good sir, no one believes in corolla owners being paindo. you need to grow up.
Second in the Legal world there has to be just ONE case to be won and on that case reference other companies gets sued for the same practice.
Corolla being thieve friendly has a ground to legalise immobilizers and once Consumer (x) Vs Indus Motor Corporation is wont this case reference will be given in future to sue other manufacturer's who practice the same . Cool?
Kuch honay tou dou, pakistan mein har banda kehta hai challaan mera kyun ker rahay ho woh bhi tou signal tor ker ja raha hai, woh aj nahi pakra gaya kal pakra jaye ga iska ye matlab tumhein bhi chor dien?
Same as toyota honda is nto justified either but atleast they are offering theft prevention in their upper variant whereas corolla is not offering it in any variant. a 2.5 million car? seriously?