A friend of mine has 2009 and his car averages 17km/l (although he said that 2009's market is around 1,175,000). I guess 2009 is CVT. But if it's not then I might spend 1200K on 2010.
Spending 1.1 million for duplicate documents is not wise.
Thanks for sharing the info but I don't feel comfortable with the duplicate docs as i might be leaving country in 2 years for my education and would sell the car. It would be difficult to get decent money for such deals.
Old shape is non CVT. And that mileage can be on Motorway but not in city. As i imported one in pristine condition with 64k original mileage on clock.Wasn't giving me more than 10/lit in city.
and the one you imported was CVT or non-CVT?
Brother old shape never came with CVT transmission. I am saying about Passo not Vitz.
Alright.
Thanks to all my brothers for providing me with the info on this thread. It really helped. God bless you.
Hope it helps.
This my friend is not true.
I own Passo 2007 for two years as of today. The worst milage i got while going to Murree/Nathia gali was 10 kmpl and the best i got was 17 kmpl. As a daily runner within pindi/islamabad i get 13/14 kmpl on average
^I get 13 14 with ac within islamabad too.old shape passo is quite good at this.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using PW Forums mobile app
Well It's a good news then because i don't like the dashboard and rear lights of the new design.
Used suzuki swift
Sent from my LT29i using PW Forums mobile app
Thats a matter of choice. In my opinion, overall the new shape is very graceful and offcourse it is better as it is CVT. But its very expensive
don,t go to 1000cc try to find 1.3 vitz