"Even if honda DID produce it, and did manage to beat the GT-R around the ring, and DID manage to price it, it wouldn't sell... it's a honda. "
who's a c*ck then?
bilal sahab, I think u havent seen the NSX-R performing on the track..
http://fastestlaps.com/track3.html
The NSX-R 3.2 was quicker then the 360 Modena, 996 Turbo, Ferrari F50 R34 V spec and many others on Tsukuba...
Fine it was a bit overpriced, but u cant say it wasnt a good car.
I don't understand the cock part, but I'll take back the NSX not being a fast car thing.
About the selling thing, it is a known fact amongst many analysts that the reason the NSX's stopped selling was due to 'brand bigotry'- $90,000 for an NSX when you could get yourself a Porsche in that money- you can get yourself an M3 in that money, a WELL EQUIPPED M3 at that.
Why wouldn't it sell very much?
Porsche gave us the 911 turbo (disregard the GT versions- not many people buy that)
Nissan gave us the "Z" and established itself from the 1970's into a a beach-side cruiser. I've been told by my father and many of his friends that THAT was the car to have back in the day- the 280Z.
Chevrolet gave us the Corvette- the name says everything.
Honda gave us..... the civic? A nicely priced, economical car.
See what I mean? Hardcore cocks who do buy these cars won't get a honda (or even an acura for that matter)