All New Suzuki Ciaz, Pakistan Launch. February 8th, 2017

[dice88]

But i dont see a single point for this car over selling City.

It has projector headlights. That's quite an achievement for Pak Suzuki. /s

[fazalwahab11375]

[fazalwahab11375]

[chinyoti]

Any updates about accessories pricing?

[fazalwahab11375]

Any updates about accessories pricing?

dont know but there are no fog lights as far as standard equipment. no mentioned. They just came up on the show

[fazalwahab11375]

[aa78]

Ciaz pros over City:

• New design compared to 8-9 years old City frame.
• Fuel efficient engine (claimed 19kmpl) vs City's typical (11-14kmpl depending on variant)
• Airbags for driver and front passenger
• Projector headlights
• Possibly softer suspension which is the bane for many City owner's driving pleasure
• Imported Bridgestone tires come installed from factory compared to City's Eurotrash
• Potentially better dash instruments than City
• Lower floor hump compared to City for rear seats
• Immobilizer which is lacking in City
• Blower air filter comes pre-installed unlike Atlas's City (penny pinchers)
• Fabric seats compared to cheap wrinkly leather (synthetic) in more expensive Aspire variants
• Trunk opening system from outside is wonderfully intuitive and refreshingly new feature
• PS has published their MT/AT gear ratios which Atlas has stopped doing since a long time now.

Ciaz cons over City:

• Not well established
• More expensive spare parts due to import taxes, no Suzuki trained personnel for now for maintenance, etc
• Bad Suzuki design language as in majority new design Suzuki cars, e.g. Wagon-R et all. Liana's boxy vestiges can still be observed.
• Lights pop out of body sides at both front and rear
• No nav unit included in price
• No alloy wheels
• High stuffy dashboard like in Corolla
• Small glovebox positioned low down
• 4AT auto variant only compared to City's 5AT

These are the main things I observed. Feel free to add/correct as necessary.

[alfa_whsky]

Ciaz pros over City:

• New design compared to 8-9 years old City frame.


• Fuel efficient engine (claimed 19kmpl) vs City's typical (11-14kmpl depending on variant)


• Airbags for driver and front passenger


• Projector headlights


• Possibly softer suspension which is the bane for many City owner's driving pleasure


• Imported Bridgestone tires come installed from factory compared to City's Eurotrash


• Potentially better dash instruments than City


• Lower floor hump compared to City for rear seats


• Immobilizer which is lacking in City


• Blower air filter comes pre-installed unlike Atlas's City (penny pinchers)


• Fabric seats compared to cheap wrinkly leather (synthetic) in more expensive Aspire variants


• Trunk opening system from outside is wonderfully intuitive and refreshingly new feature


• PS has published their MT/AT gear ratios which Atlas has stopped doing since a long time now.

Ciaz cons over City:

• Not well established


• More expensive spare parts due to import taxes, no Suzuki trained personnel for now for maintenance, etc


• Bad Suzuki design language as in majority new design Suzuki cars, e.g. Wagon-R et all. Liana's boxy vestiges can still be observed.


• Lights pop out of body sides at both front and rear


• No nav unit included in price


• No alloy wheels


• High stuffy dashboard like in Corolla


• Small glovebox positioned low down


• 4AT auto variant only compared to City's 5AT

These are the main things I observed. Feel free to add/correct as necessary.

cabin & boot space may also be mentioned

[aa78]

cabin & boot space may also be mentioned

They are about the same. No significant difference felt. Front seats feel stuffy and slightly cramped due to high dashboard like in Corolla. YMMV.

[alfa_whsky]

[quote="aa78, post:169, topic:448176, full:true"]

cabin & boot space may also be mentioned

They are about the same. No significant difference felt. Front seats feel stuffy and slightly cramped due to high dashboard like in Corolla. YMMV.

[/quote]

are rear headrests adjustable?

[Sarkaar]

This is off topic but observed this on this thread.

Quoting long comments is annoying specially with images, @Admin, Can we stop images to be part of quoted response ?

[Sarkaar]

2 things would have made a much greater impact in same price

1. Multimedia/navigation unit with back cam
2. Climate control AC

Or reduce the prices by straingh 1 lac on both variants

[aa78]

are rear headrests adjustable?

Didn't check.

[umair2203]

Does the Ciaz has the rear AC vents ?

[fazalwahab11375]

Does the Ciaz has the rear AC vents ?

Not on Pakistani version.

Also fog lights are not available

[umair2203]

They are going to introduce a utility / accessory package like they did with the launch of Wagon R . I saw it on brochure.. it includes

1. Fog lights , Chrome Garnish around fog lights
2. Door visors
3. Rear Chrome garnish (that should had been standard)
4. Floor matts
5. Trunk Tray

Price is not disclosed for the accessory package but I am guessing it'll be 50k+

[umair2203]

Registration + Advance tax details for Suzuki Ciaz .. as it is a CBU so WHT is not collected at the time of purchase.
It is important to mention that although it is a 1400cc but its WHT+reg is cheaper then that a 1300cc class

[umair2203]

No vanity Mirrors ... I mean come on Suzuki ... you guys are hopeless

[samahir]

Suzuki saza will be epic failure .not a single good review anywhere

[Maliko1]

Suzuki saza will be epic failure .not a single good review anywhere

3 logo ne keh dia to fail ho gae ciaz
And my brother's jdm 660 is very much better than ciaz .does my brother even stand near by ciaz to hav gud look?No! Bs internet pe pictures daikhin aur Suzuki ka nam daikha aur bs haters shuru
Arey bhai usey aney to do Allah ka shuker karo city gli se hat kar kuch to nazar aye ga c/b Class segment mean