@genius83
This is not the first time his account has been closed and his videos removed. It's been happening to him. Bernie and the FIA can shove where the sun don't shine. He will be back and blocked again. A really nice video by him.
Environmentalists, they are every where. Some time back they were trying to remove the Italian GP from Monza park, as the track is right in the middle of a park and they claimed the sound was doing something, i don't remember exactly what it was they were moaning about.
Our never ending discussion. Well, who wants to see a championship decided by mechanical problems, reliability of any kind? That's the most cruel way to win or lose a title. Reliability has improved a lot now, even before these rules where brought in, do you remember how long Schumacher went before he had that engine problem at Suzuka? Reliability was one of the reasons for his success. Top teams will always have reliability because they have more money, more resources. Even with one engine per GP rule, the top teams will be there or there abouts. It's a lot like the English Premier League as one person put it, the top four will be the top four. They used to be the top three before Abramovich arrived with his billions and made Chelsea one of the top teams, like Dietrich Mateschitz is trying to do with Red Bull.
Red Bull, many rumors about what actually happened in Bahrain. If they were actually running the mixture lean it is going to happen to them again and again. That will always destroy spark plugs. The other story is the Ron Dennis supported stuff about not having enough fuel. With or without the one engine rule, Vettel was going to lose the lead of the race. He was running with one cylinder less if the spark plug theory is right and was a sitting duck on the straights especially when the trouble hit him initially. It robbed us of what might have been an interesting fight because the pace Alonso showed towards the end might have been too much for Red Bull to handle but we'll never know that one.
Tires, nah, they didn't benefit one team. Mclaren almost won the championship in 2005, running on Michelins. Williams would have won the title in 2003 on Michelins, had FIA, Ferrari not conspired to do what they did and the final nail in the coffin were the race stewards at Indy, who effectively ended the title fight. Raikkonen still carried on in one year old car and took the fight to the last race. Renault won back to back championships not because of Michelin tires but it was the whole package including the driver. BAR, in the hands of a half decent driver would have done a lot better than they did in 2004, but still as BAR that was their best season i think. Ferrari got what they deserved along with Bridgestone, when they were producing Ferrari specific tires which made a lot of top teams switch from Bridgestone to Michelins, leaving Ferrari, Minardi and one other team on Bridgestone. Tire war is the cheapest and easiest way to spice things up if they really need to be that is. If this season develops into an intense rivalry between two drivers, two teams, and not a rivalry based on great mutual respect etc, but nasty, like Ferrari and Mclaren had n 07 and08, everyone will forget about tracks, changes to F1, and how boring the races are. If Bernie's nightmare, which he has talked about a few times now in different interviews, comes true and the Spaniard gets off to a flying start in the first four races then we are in for a very boring season.
P.S. lol, Schumacher works in mysterious ways. You called called Alonso the best driver on the grid, which he undoubtedly is, but look what happened to your computer and the date on it:P Schumacher's revenge maybe?
