Report: Ford will attempt to stop Ferrari from using F150 name
Yea right, like anyone was going to mistakenly buy the Ferrari F1 car instead of a pick up:P And good on Ford for preventing their image from being tarnished, lol. How dare Ferrari name their state of the art car after Ford's best selling truck:-# Henry Ford vs Enzo Ferrari, the saga continues:S
Anyway, Ferrari have changed the name to Ferrari F150th-Italia
from where are u reading those complete articles ?? :S ...
Genius is not a genius for no reason:D
but i don't knw how much is 5 pint ?? 
...
I thought you'd be well versed in ordering a pint of cough cough never mind:P
I think it's about 2 liters. That's what google said i think:S
Renault to evaluate Heidfeld at Jerez
Nick Heidfeld will test for Renault at Jerez later this week as the outfit evaluates a replacement for the injured Robert Kubica.
Bruno Senna seems to be out of the running for Renault seat. They, Renault, are now looking for a long term replacement and it seems to be between Heidfeld, PDR and strangely Luizzi 
Some interesting stuff posted during testing today:
AUTOSPORT's news editor @glenn_autosportsays: Eric Boullier has addressed his comments since Robert Kubica's accident. He has said that his initial comments about Senna were in reference to if Renault ever needed a stand-in for a short period of time.
But with the chances of Kubica's absence being anything up to a full season, the team is looking for a replacement under different circumstances to those Boullier was considering when asked at the Renault launch.
Bruno is still in the mix - and will get a chance to test for the team this weekend - but the general feeling coming out of the team is that it needs an experienced campaigner if a long-term stand-in is required.
AUTOSPORT F1 editor @eddstrawF1 says about Mercedes
I have serious concerns about where Mercedes is at the moment, although I must add the caveat that drawing conclusions based on the first test is very dangerous. Ignoring the laptimes, I'm hearing that those inside the team are not delighted with the way the car is performing. If that is the case, Mercedes could be looking at a similar year to 2010.
Having said that, even if Mercedes is struggling right now, that isn't to say that things can't be turned around. In 2008, BMW was in serious trouble early in testing, but at the final test got the car working and Robert Kubica was leading the championship after the Canadian Grand Prix.
There are some capable people at Mercedes and Ross Brawn's leadership can't be under-estimated, so it's best to reserve judgement.
Going back to laptimes, you have to be very careful judging teams based on that in testing. Fuel makes a huge difference (three-tenths of a second per 10kg at Valencia) and teams will be concentrating on their development programmes. This idea that teams are sandbagging early in testing is misleading for the simple reason that no one is chasing headline times. Context is everything.
Talking about their two element front wing:
I'm sure that they have continued to look closely at a three-element design. The basic advantage of a two-element front wing is more surface area and therefore more downforce, but it is far more prone to airflow separation. The team, which as you say, went two-element in 2009 as its form dropped off, but seems committed to making the design work.
There may be some specific reasons for doing this that might only apply to that car; remember, the front wing doesn't work in isolation and they may feel the way the two-element design interacts with the rest of the car is advantageous. As you say, the team is going against the trend, so it's possible that it's the wrong direction – but there's far more to Mercedes's struggles than that I expect.
@Eddie
Read the last line or two. Sorry.
Boullier defends decision to let Kubica rally
