Honda CD 70 2013 or Suzuki Raider 2013

[ShugMan]

according to fuel consumption i am asking this question as Suzuki claims that Raider has a mileage of 70 CC bike, so which one will be better Suzuki Cd 70 or Raider 110 which has a mileage of 70 cc bike and thanks supporting

[ShugMan]

mey nay ye sawal iss liye poucha kyu kay Suzuki walay kehtay hay Raider ky fuel consumption 70 CC bike ky tarha hay, tou kya ye behtar agr fuel consumption kay lehaz sey dekhay ya Honda CD 70?

[devilskreed]

mey nay ye sawal iss liye poucha kyu kay Suzuki walay kehtay hay Raider ky fuel consumption 70 CC bike ky tarha hay, tou kya ye behtar agr fuel consumption kay lehaz sey dekhay ya Honda CD 70?

Bhai pehli baat to eh hai kay aap 70cc bike ko 100cc say compare nai kar saktay..Raider zyada aramday hai 70cc bike say..Yeh 70cc bike sirf fuel consumption main thik hoti hain magr aram,pick,ride comfort main pasay ko bhi nai ati pridor/raider kay..Jo china 70 bikes hain wo apko 50-60 km/L dain gi aur cd-70 60 say upar day gi..Raider/pridor afko 50+km/L day gi ..Baki apki marzi

Raider apko 70cc bike ki kabhi bhi consumption NAI day gi..Us say ziada hi petrol khayay gi

[ali47]

go for junoon instead of pridor or raider i use to have a junoon it used to give me 57-60 km/L model 2009.
there is no match with the comfort and road grip of junoon....

[Automotorsport_Lover]

go for junoon instead of pridor or raider i use to have a junoon it used to give me 57-60 km/L model 2009.
there is no match with the comfort and road grip of junoon....

Stay away from new junoons what so ever! Much better options in the market for same prices..

[ShugMan]

i am not going for Junoons i know a useless motor bike it is. I will go for Suzuki or Honda

[ShugMan]

wrong question ..70cc vs 110cc ...no match at all ...

according to Suzuki, Suzuki Raider consumption mileage is of 70 CC bike, well i wanted to know that which company is better Suzuki or Honda, my needs depends on consumption of fuel. Honda Cd 70 and Suzuki Raider 110 (mileage of 70 CC) which one would be better, as you already know that the prices of the petrol are always increasing so i depend on fuel consumption. So from my view this is not wrong question

[rulfat]

raider is the best .u cant compare cd70 and beautiful raider

[shamoon2488]

no comparison,,,,,raider is much better than cd70

[adeelxp2003]

Raider /sprinter are much better in fuel consumption ,comfort ,road grip ,pickup etc . Each and everything is much better in Raider /sprinter.
When my sprinter is new it give me 60+ km in 1liter ,after 2.5year its give me 55km in 1liter with average speed 80+km.

[ShugMan]

no comparison,,,,,raider is much better than cd70

so tell me one thing bro if i compare Honda Pridor with Raider which one will you prefer?

[Automotorsport_Lover]

Which of these bike is better?

Mod Edit : Moved Thread To Correct Section

There is no proper comparison between a 70cc and a 110cc.

It all epends upon what u are looking for? If ur very strict on budget and bearing fuel costs is a problem, then theres no alternate to trial and tested durability and low fuel consumption of a CD70... but if u also want to add power and comfort but are ready to sacrifice a litle on the fuel consumption then Rider or pridor are good options.

Comparison of fuel consumption at ideal conditions on a long route...

The slower you go the more powerful engine of raider/pridor will give u better milage..
The faster u go, cd70's engine starts eating petrol and equals down to the economy of a 100-110cc bike.

But the maintinence sost of 100-110cc are significantly higher than a 70.

[vickytulla]

comparison nahi banta but phir bhi ... 70 is for those who are tight on budget.. raider is a high speed machine from 100cc category with relaiable engine beside it also equally competitive in terms of mileage.

PS raider backup is a bit expensive then others in its class so if budget is tight in every day use then its not recommended.

I hope it helps.

raider is the best .u cant compare cd70 and beautiful raider

[Mughira]

There is no proper comparison between a 70cc and a 110cc.

It all epends upon what u are looking for? If ur very strict on budget and bearing fuel costs is a problem, then theres no alternate to trial and tested durability and low fuel consumption of a CD70... but if u also want to add power and comfort but are ready to sacrifice a litle on the fuel consumption then Rider or pridor are good options.

Comparison of fuel consumption at ideal conditions on a long route...

The slower you go the more powerful engine of raider/pridor will give u better milage..
The faster u go, cd70's engine starts eating petrol and equals down to the economy of a 100-110cc bike.

But the maintinence sost of 100-110cc are significantly higher than a 70.

i bought RAIDER two weeks ago. I noticed the fuel average is not much good. Its 38km/L. And bike missing b kafi krti ae low rpm par. Only 150km done. Kya tuning k bhd average thek ho jaye gi?

[SyedMoazzam]

Yar during running bike always consume a lot of fuel as the parts have to properly break in and the friction between parts is more during running
After break in period the mileage will increase significantly provided you are a caring person and take care of your bike's performance like good quality oil, proper lubrication and keeping all the filers clean.
Abhi to ibtada hay abi say ghabra *** ustaad;)

[Mughira]

Yar during running bike always consume a lot of fuel as the parts have to properly break in and the friction between parts is more during running
After break in period the mileage will increase significantly provided you are a caring person and take care of your bike's performance like good quality oil, proper lubrication and keeping all the filers clean.
Abhi to ibtada hay abi say ghabra *** ustaad;)

thanx for reply. But ek post pay dkha tha. The person was saying his bike doing 60km/L during running process.
Islye thori confusion hui.

[talhabinomar]

yaar go for 100cc may be raider or pridor. but plz do not go for 70cc. price 10k tak ka difference hai par driving comfort bohat achi hai

[abdulrehmanrauf]

Don't get tense. Its a matter of fine tunning. One of my cousin has GS-150. He was getting hardly 30kms/lit (@ avg. speed 70km/hr) after 1000kms. I asked him to get tuned his bike from a specialist. After the tunning, now he is getting a very good average of around 50 - 53 km/lit with same average speed of 70km/liter.

Additionally I asked my cousin to ride in lower rpms. Do not accelerate your bike like CGs of CDs. Suzuki bikes are little different. If you pick them hard they will give you good acceleration, but less fuel average. If you pick them softly and gradually increase your speed, they will give you very good fuel average.

So get relaxed and find some good specialist mechanic.

thanx for reply. But ek post pay dkha tha. The person was saying his bike doing 60km/L during running process.
Islye thori confusion hui.

[Mughira]

Don't get tense. Its a matter of fine tunning. One of my cousin has GS-150. He was getting hardly 30kms/lit (@ avg. speed 70km/hr) after 1000kms. I asked him to get tuned his bike from a specialist. After the tunning, now he is getting a very good average of around 50 - 53 km/lit with same average speed of 70km/liter.

Additionally I asked my cousin to ride in lower rpms. Do not accelerate your bike like CGs of CDs. Suzuki bikes are little different. If you pick them hard they will give you good acceleration, but less fuel average. If you pick them softly and gradually increase your speed, they will give you very good fuel average.

So get relaxed and find some good specialist mechanic.

thanks. Ab InshaALLAH tuning k bhd fuel average share krun ga.

[2468]

Both have good 22,000 rupees difference, so comparison not valid.