Please stop with the delusions. You have been parading this for a long time now. What is this miraculous "tech" you keep referring to in Honda City? Please enlighten us.
What objective data you have to verify your claims of a Honda City engine being more reliable than a Toyota Corolla's engine? Please backup your claims with credible independently verifiable objective data or your words hold no weight.
What makes you believe the only reason Honda didnt launch the latest generation of City is because it has some "tech" that makes it still competitive to a Corolla? Don't you think the City is still being sold in adequate numbers is because there is no brand new car alternative in that category(sub-compact B segment)?
FYI, if you go to Germany, you will see Mercedes Benz as taxis. If you go to USA, you'll see Ford Crown Victoria, Prius, Camry, Sonata as taxis. Being used as a taxi is a testament to the reliability and dependability of a car. And instead of being negative, it should be considered as a badge of honour. It means it's easy and affordable to maintain, practical and reliable.
Please do not speak like a fanboy. Try to back your claims with verifiable data. It makes the conversation more productive for every participant.
At the end of the day, whether it is Honda Atlas or Indus motors, all that matters to them is their profits, and they will do anything to maximize that.