Honda City Beige color Interior

[RN427]

I have a question in my mind and want to ask from fellow pakwheelers!!!

The question is that as all we know that the new Honda City Aspire has Prosmatec Transmission, so why it is said that the simple City has CVT transmission when it had "PT" written after the "CITY" logo in the previous model...So this means the old model is also prosmatec and if not then this is a big mistake by Honda Pakistan!!!

On their website they have written that the new City Aspire is changed to Prosmatec transmission from standard AT!!!

Please tell me about it!!!

[autophile]

It was standard AT and all auto city previously had AT sticker. I guess the simple City is still coming with same and there was never a CVT in this version in Pakistan by Atlas. Only previous model Vario had CVT.

[i_m_legend]

Earlier A/T has also been now Prosmatec as per Honda Salesman & attached info. Had alook on aspire today, Side mirror indicators are just lookin awesome along with rims... & its 1300cc!
Leather seats are not that bad, but not porsche quality either:P
Overall I think a fair package!

^^!!!!!!

[RN427]

Ok sorry had a misunderstanding and can you tell me how is the performance of the the AT City and the PT Aspire City, is it necessary to pay Rs 120,000 more for the Aspire just for the sake of Prosmatec transmission or the AT is also fine???

[autophile]

Ok, it means prosmetic in all auto versions of new City from now onwards

[Skt_Z4]

Just Came Back from Expo Center
Well HONDA is not going to Launch Any sports Model of City. It was just for the Promotion of KANSAI paint, They were showing that HONDA use their paint for their Cars. Till now no Confirmed Info abt Sports model. Here are some Pics in Action: (H)

Till now only City ASPIRE is launched Officially! Sorry for Bad quality of dis pic

[i_m_legend]

@RN427 bro!,It is all about preference. I mashallah booked city aspire MT. It is all about one's own preferences. We had lot of times made this discussion about city aspire or simple city in this forum. You can go through this forum.I will just put it that make your own choice and inshallah it will be good for you.

[i_m_legend]

@SKTZ_4 Dude! Pics are nice and so is the city

[highroller]

Seems like few corolla fans are here

trying to inspire

by taking something from city aspire

Blow off the fire

By the way, I personally like gli

Dude I appreciate ur comments but I'm trying to prove a point. The point being I expected city asipire will improve suspension n give some beige or a better material dash but I'm afraid it came out to have same ugly interior requiring a daily aspirin everytime you give.
I have 2010 city n I live it's performance and fuel efficiency but loathe it's interior.

To cut short my crap I wanted atlas reflect every penny we pay them esp on the interior!! U must agree city has a pathetic interior.

[hammads13]

well evry1 has his opinion, i think city interior is ok the problem is with its suspension which is v v hard.

[king]

advan db and db are different bro

bro. reffering to ur post here i m taking abt

yoko AVS DB
or
yoko advan db (H)

Avs db wud have a lower price tag than advan db, bt i'll post updated prices soon as i also intend to change tyres

[i_m_legend]

Agree with highroller and everyone about issues in city and not denying it.

But come on they did SOMETHING, i mean something atleast in aspire. I wish they should have done something better like everyone wishes but then there are reasons which we discussed many times.

Compared to other companies they did raise a little bar.If one do not like aspire one should not buy it and feel good about it

Every automobile manufacturing company in Pakistan has issues.

[RN427]

@ i m legend

Congrats brother for booking your City Aspire MT, but can you tell me the real difference between the A/T and P/T version of Honda City?

I think A/T was also not that bad!!!

[speedster_101]

with that tyre width, i am sure Car pick will be Reduced and increase in Road grip!.

wat effect it has on mileage?

The mileage is very good because thats what Michelin Energy Savors are designed for. 15 Km/L in city driving and around 17 Km/L on long routes. I am talking about the real mileage, not the gadget. No, pick hasn't reduced I guess (I haven't felt a difference). Its still great.
I was worried about two things though.
1) Tyres touching the car.
2) Error in speedometer reading.
But I am glad to tell you that both of these things did not happen. I have driven my car with full load (6 adults and luggage) on bumpy roads but the tyres don't touch the body at all. And about speedometer reading. I have tested it on several GPS devices. The car's speedometer and GPS shows 100% same speed. Strange but true.
I used Eurostar tyres for only 300 Km, but I can surely say that they were very hard and bumpy. They can be used with Corolla because it has a softer suspension but they shouldn't be used with Honda City whose suspension is a bit sporty/hard.
And one more thing, ABS used to activate more frequently with those EuroStar tyres.

[Nomi929]

The mileage is very good because thats what Michelin Energy Savors are designed for. 15 Km/L in city driving and around 17 Km/L on long routes. I am talking about the real mileage, not the gadget. No, pick hasn't reduced I guess (I haven't felt a difference). Its still great.
I was worried about two things though.
1) Tyres touching the car.
2) Error in speedometer reading.
But I am glad to tell you that both of these things did not happen. I have driven my car with full load (6 adults and luggage) on bumpy roads but the tyres don't touch the body at all. And about speedometer reading. I have tested it on several GPS devices. The car's speedometer and GPS shows 100% same speed. Strange but true.
I used Eurostar tyres for only 300 Km, but I can surely say that they were very hard and bumpy. They can be used with Corolla because it has a softer suspension but they shouldn't be used with Honda City whose suspension is a bit sporty/hard.
And one more thing, ABS used to activate more frequently with those EuroStar tyres.

Well the reason that the new tyres doesnt touches the car is bcoz tire size 195/60 R15 is just 3mm higher than stock tire size, which is negligible, and speedometer is only 1% slow than normal.

yes i have driven my friend's city and straight away i felt that suspension is very hard as compared to other cars.

Btw wats the price of these Michelin Energy Savers?

[waleed80]

Well the reason that the new tyres doesnt touches the car is bcoz tire size 195/60 R15 is just 3mm higher than stock tire size, which is negligible, and speedometer is only 1% slow than normal.

yes i have driven my friend's city and straight away i felt that suspension is very hard as compared to other cars.

Btw wats the price of these Michelin Energy Savers?

he is using 195/65 R15 which are a lil too big as compared to stock

[Nomi929]

he is using 195/65 R15 which are a lil too big as compared to stock

Ohh Sorry, i thought it was 195/60.

IMO 195/65 R15 is not an ideal Tire Size for City.

[waleed80]

^^^

yups...its a lil too big. i need a general suggestion by the way. as i m getting the delivery of ma car in few weeks InshAllah, and i m planning to change the stock tyres on day one, a question rises that shud i go for 195/60 or 185/65 (both in R15 offcourse). the problem with corolla and earlier models wwas that due to thin tyre the car lacked grip and braking both. here in this case with the new city, braking is already superb, even with the stock tyres. so, just to get a lil better grip, i personally think i shud not exceed 185 cause 195 wud get me nothing extra (except a lil better look offcourse, which doesnt matter to me much), except for relatively bad fuel economy. suggestions please

[Nomi929]

^^^

yups...its a lil too big. i need a general suggestion by the way. as i m getting the delivery of ma car in few weeks InshAllah, and i m planning to change the stock tyres on day one, a question rises that shud i go for 195/60 or 185/65 (both in R15 offcourse). the problem with corolla and earlier models wwas that due to thin tyre the car lacked grip and braking both. here in this case with the new city, braking is already superb, even with the stock tyres. so, just to get a lil better grip, i personally think i shud not exceed 185 cause 195 wud get me nothing extra (except a lil better look offcourse, which doesnt matter to me much), except for relatively bad fuel economy. suggestions please

personally i wont be going for anything higher than 185, problem with 185/65 is that it will increase the height by 2% and same percentage of inaccuracy in speed meter reading.

[waleed80]

thats my point. 2 percent is gud enuf. car companies allow/permit a max of 3% +/- difference from their stock size. moreover, car wud be raised by 0.5 inches as compared to 0.2 inches if i use 195/60. so what i m getting is :-

1. better ride hide
2. more comfort cause of more wall
3. better fuel economy
4. ALMOST same grip as of 195 (if both tyres are Yokos or something imported)