Honda City or Toyota vitz

[usmanatt]

i am planning to buy a car in 2 days...What u ppl suggest...i have seen 2 cars yesterday

1- Toyota Vitz(2009) import 2012(11000km)
OR
2- Honda City(2012)

please ur opinion will be appreciated....

honda city would be best option ... honda city is very fuel efficient car as compared to vitz ...vitz got electric accelratr cng is not successful as in honda city their always tuning issue in vitz if u install cng....

[RN427]

Obviously go for CITY more power better peformance than VITZ...(City Brand New Flawless) vs Vitz (OLD and USED + Meter Tempered) so VITZ may give issues in a short period of time whereas CITY will tend to give no issues for years!!!

City has got bigger boot bigger body...Good ABS brakes...Comfortable drive though not more than VITZ but i think not less than VITZ also because after all its a HONDA!!!

As far as you are considering the transmission of CITY bro my clear cut advice to you don't go for Auto City...It has very poor peformance as compared to MANUAL but if you are too much COMFORT LOVER than Auto may be a better choice ...rest the decision is yours...AUTO may also give some issues as said by a PAKWHEELER about his 2011 Auto City but MANUAL DOESN'T BOTHERS SO PLEASE GO FOR MANUAL AND ENJOY!!! :):)

[talha_hanif]

Any particular reason for not recommending City Auto ? Just curious to know why...

auto city has knocking problem.
poor mileage, bad transmission.
overall its a big disapointment.

almost every city(auto) owner will describe you its -ve points.
i also own a city but its manual.
infact manual city is the best PKDM Car in 1.3 category.

its really so economical.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

[talha_hanif]

Obviously go for CITY more power better peformance than VITZ...(City Brand New Flawless) vs Vitz (OLD and USED + Meter Tempered) so VITZ may give issues in a short period of time whereas CITY will tend to give no issues for years!!!

City has got bigger boot bigger body...Good ABS brakes...Comfortable drive though not more than VITZ but i think not less than VITZ also because after all its a HONDA!!!

As far as you are considering the transmission of CITY bro my clear cut advice to you don't go for Auto City...It has very poor peformance as compared to MANUAL but if you are too much COMFORT LOVER than Auto may be a better choice ...rest the decision is yours...AUTO may also give some issues as said by a PAKWHEELER about his 2011 Auto City but MANUAL DOESN'T BOTHERS SO PLEASE GO FOR MANUAL AND ENJOY!!! :):)

+1 for suggestion.
City( not Auto)

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

[muzammil105]

After the petrol goes to 92 RON (High octane) the Knocking of automatic city is now finished

[roboxx]

If you are going for auto City, go for 1.5 Auto.

[ahmednk]

Dear Brothers

I have budget of 14 to 16 lacs but I'm confused which car is best. Your sincere suggestion will be of high value.

I have shortlisted following cars

1. City 2011 or 2012 (auto)
2. Vitz 2012 import 2015
3. Civic prosmatic 2011 0r 2012

Please suggest

[mgalaxy3]

Comfort = Vitz
Fuel econ = Vitz
Safety = Vitz
Power = City (bigger engine, only better on steep climbs on mountains, otherwise not much practical difference)
Trunk space= City

Now you decide!