[SUB]Seating Comfort:
- I don't understand why people over-exaggerate the comfort of Toyota Corolla's seating comfort, the difference is definitely there but not much. Both Honda City and Toyota Corolla's seating comfort is almost the same with Corolla providing around 10% - 15% more comfort.[/SUB]
Contradicting.
[SUB]Braking (ABS):
- Once again I found Honda City's braking quality a bit better than Toyota Corolla's. Not a major difference but I'd say the braking of Honda City is at least 15% - 20% better than the braking of Toyota Corolla.[/SUB]
Tires matter alot, I still to try hard braking a City
[SUB]Turning Radius:
While technically both of the car should offer the same turning radius but Toyota fails to do so. Honda City's turning is much easier than Toyota Corolla.[/SUB]
What techniqe is that? I need to know that too, Cultus alto Vitz, Vitz has the best turning radius, Corolla is longer car hence the longer turning radius, The tire size doesnt determine the turning radius if you think both the cars have 15'' tires.
[SUB]Other factors:
- I also noticed that Toyota Corolla has some very unnecessary width that makes it more likely to get dented and scratched in heavy traffic. Honda City however is a bit compact and hence a bit safer.[/SUB]
Fir to mehran hee chalao bhae, What does un-necessary width means? The cars actualy broader then City and has more mm of interior capacity
PS: The post is biased