cl9, if u like a sport look and performance
go for merc c 200kompresser instead of both
the thing i don't like in mrak x is the hump between the rear seats also it is very ground clearence
but my Max Cash Range is 21-22
i dont think i can get a 2003/2004 C200 for that price
Mark X
Mark X (Y) M Loving it !
mark x all the wayi have both but mark x is something different and way better than accord
1st - Mark X 'Koji' 2nd - Accord CL9
MARK X "comes first always"
If budget is no issue then the X for sure
yehi tou problem hai hamarey saath k hum good fuel economy ko performance k saath milatey hain jabkey yeh dono aik saath nai chal sakteen. ppl r saying that mark x is better performance n fuel wise which is nt possible in this world. A person who is going to buy a car which is priced arnd 18 or 20 lakhs should not think of fuel economy then. I have cl9 and after driving my frnds x 3.0l i do not regret abt my decision to go for ACCORD.
Keeping budget in consideration I suggest you to go for mark X.
I agree wid all who are saying that X is better, but the X factor is missing From MarkX, I dunno wat that factor is but its surely missing from it. Imean it didnt brought any smile on my face when i drove my frnds Markx 3.0l.
X
The car is giving 6 Kilometer per liter and thats a good fuel economy :(:s and you say its good... Mark X is worse car...Not much to drive.....
