What can I say.... Pakwheels Forum is a little addictive I would say. .....and you know what......I'm not embarrassed that I wrote to much.
GS engine produces 10% less horsepower per CC than CG125 Engine. So basically an GS engine which happens to be an OHC (more advanced than CG's OHV engine) is less efficient. If GS would have had same engine displacement as CG, it would only produce 10BHP whereas CG manages 11 BHP. For me its a step backwards.
hehehehe Come on man........you smile when you use the self starter in your GS.......Good for you
I agree GS has a higher top speed ... but my point is you dont touch the top speed everyday....in the real life CG is faster....So basically a CG owner smiles more often than a GS owner.......because CG owner can smile in the first 4 gears........ whereas a GS owner will smile once when he starts the bike and secondly when he hits the fifth gear.........hhahahahha..... thats silly....but true.
I never said GS is a bad motorcycle....... The only reason I speak against GS here is because of he fact ppl keep on praising GS because it has modern technology. All I want to express is that GS is not reaping the more essential benefits of a modern technology like disc brakes and modern standards fuel efficiency like you see in Indian Bikes. Our masses aint ready for the change so manufacturers are shy to experiment with something truly modern. So if retro is what we are good at than embrace retro bikes....like classic CG125, CD200 etc etc. GS150 is a "wanna be" modern bike.......and I personally dont like Suzuki's approach when they laucnched it.