The "EC1 Scam" Thread

[VCheng]

yes it is a magic wanna know the mantar ????????????

It would be better if you can describe the technology and rationale being used rather than choomanter tona totkas.

[atta1111]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[atta1111]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[capsat]

@atta so please share D_ick & Garlic engineering tech with us. Is it new technology curriculam started under raiwind sponorship how to scam people

Chena malai fly high a wider sweep is needed in this 'SCAM' you started ! warna it will blow up the FinLess Turbo running under EC1 over a cat dozer

[cool_raja]

my horses are calm dear u completely missed the point of my post. its not ur fault because as i can c in ur recent post your sense of humor is worse than horse sh*t.

[cool_raja]

btw w8ing for ur cng hybrid system now

[atta1111]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[SER_GTR]

They Are Already Asked And You Are More Than welcome To ASK..

Just Don't Be Like You Didn't Know Anything....!

[VCheng]

Ok Haji saab ask the question's one by one

What is inside the black box?

[atta1111]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[VCheng]

What is inside the blackbox ? there are few electrical circuit's in it which can modify add or subtract the voltage offset's of the normal input signal of the sensor to the ECU. that's it
Haji saab next question

It takes a little more than modifying voltages to fool an ECU. What you describe simply CANNOT work as you claim.

[atta1111]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[atta1111]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[fazalwahab11375]

[Driver41]

$50,000/1500kg mercedes = $33.3/kg
$5,000,000/200,000kg = $25/kg

(Im assuming the big machine weighs atleast 200 metric tons)

So there you go, mercedes is more expensive than big machine per kg

Good work accountant Ur nickname justified

[SER_GTR]

The word LITTLE MORE is a great word for you but not for US . We had find the way's how to modify them and how much. we do had a control to run an engine so much leaner that it can stop at a stage where it is not possible to run it or even start it and also we can enrich the mixture to the extent level that the vehicle will emitt so much black smoke which will cause the engine to stop running.

Explain That Ways YOu FIND...Please....! Beside Kala Jadoo And Hypnotising Engine/ECM

This Is What I want To Know.....Altering O2/Injector /MAP/MAF Signals Are Rejected Simply.....Anything New?

[SER_GTR]

Good work accountant Ur nickname justified

Adjust Some Last Words Here There And You Got It Perfect .......

[atta1111]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[VCheng]

no they are not rejected unless you do understand their working properly. some people do experiment's ans try to enforce the ecu in one command to get control but they are unsuccessful in their action's like @hameed

As pointed out previosuly by @xulfiqar, you do not understand the working of the system yourself, so please do not claim that you do, or explain the following observations:

are you serious or do you consider us to be fools - you assume that the toyota nomeclature for crank sensor is universal? - the NE sensor in a toyota is a variable reluctance sensor - not every manufacturer uses that.

btw - how do you determine that the NE+ is for positioning? For understanding what I mean in plain saadi saadi terms.

Have you ever wondered why in some toyota applications the G- pin is shared between both the NE and G+ sensors? - ITS A reference signal - not a positioning signal. The ECU needs a set signal to reference against.

The positioning is detected by the cam phaser signal - In old toyota with group fire injectors and distributor like 4EFE etc. there was no G signal and the distributor just fired the ignitor on every crank signal phase as the 4 pole reluctor went past it. The injectors were paired so it did not matter what piston was where as long as the crank/cam belt was correct - it could not backfire.

Man - Till now I have seen some really blunt childish mistakes on your side.

1 - you assume the post cat o2 sensor has role in fuel trim
2 - you think that fuel trim can be more than 100%
3 - you think that the crank sensor can be phased out of time with no ill effects
4 - you think a 2 wire crank sensor has one wire for speed and one for phase.
5 - you think that lean mix is good for the cat.

What are you on about?

VCheng please - update the original first post of yours with these 5 findings.

[VCheng]

no they are not rejected unless you do understand their working properly. some people do experiment's ans try to enforce the ecu in one command to get control but they are unsuccessful in their action's like @hameed

As pointed out previosuly by @xulfiqar, you do not understand the working of the system yourself, so please do not claim that you do, or explain the following observations:

are you serious or do you consider us to be fools - you assume that the toyota nomeclature for crank sensor is universal? - the NE sensor in a toyota is a variable reluctance sensor - not every manufacturer uses that.

btw - how do you determine that the NE+ is for positioning? For understanding what I mean in plain saadi saadi terms.

Have you ever wondered why in some toyota applications the G- pin is shared between both the NE and G+ sensors? - ITS A reference signal - not a positioning signal. The ECU needs a set signal to reference against.

The positioning is detected by the cam phaser signal - In old toyota with group fire injectors and distributor like 4EFE etc. there was no G signal and the distributor just fired the ignitor on every crank signal phase as the 4 pole reluctor went past it. The injectors were paired so it did not matter what piston was where as long as the crank/cam belt was correct - it could not backfire.

Man - Till now I have seen some really blunt childish mistakes on your side.

1 - you assume the post cat o2 sensor has role in fuel trim
2 - you think that fuel trim can be more than 100%
3 - you think that the crank sensor can be phased out of time with no ill effects
4 - you think a 2 wire crank sensor has one wire for speed and one for phase.
5 - you think that lean mix is good for the cat.

What are you on about?

VCheng please - update the original first post of yours with these 5 findings.