there is nothing wrong in being fan of any car, but for comparison there should be some logic, and on logic XLI fans cant beat city, and yes i agree GLI is better for comparison with City.
u r right but rolla fans were doing biased comparisons
they were biased towards rolla and were not admitting the real facts about both cars
Cut the crap.. you guys are not simply getting it. Im not a corolla fan. And I like Honda more than corolla. And this is the reason I have Honda city 2005 as my personal car instead of a corolla. The car performance is such that im extremely happy with my choice of buying Honda city.
But, It's all about personal choice due to which someone prefers an XLI over a City. Logic for you has nothing to do with logic for someone else.
I take my case.
I agree City 2009 has better features than XLI. Power windows, ABS, colors etc. general consensus
City drive is better than XLI. General consensus
Quality of parts in City maybe better than XLI. Many people agree
But for me, looks of XLI 2009 are way better than City 09.
That last point is so important for me that I'll simply choose XLI 2009 over City 2009 if i have to buy a car right now. Afterall why people pay such a high price for Ferarri? Why Merc? Looks definitely is one reason. To me, XLI 09 model looks like a more expensice car than city 2009. No matter city score so many points over other things, but car appearance is what im concerned most. And thus XLI is a logical choice for me. After all, you should buy the car which gives u maximum satisfaction, and i know having the XLI in black color, will give me greater satisfaction.