Moved to Correct Section [Mod Edit]
Dear Which 1 is best economically (on Ac/CNG) and effective?
well i own a city 2002 and have no issues with it as far as the car is concerned. I get 110-130km on a 60 kg tank w/o A.C on and 90-100km with AC. Don't know about the baleno
city.....better ecconomy.......
my 99 baleno did 90 kms on cng...on 55 ltr cng cylinder.....
dnt know abt city's cng mileage,,but baleno is a crap in front of city2002.
baleno is good because genuine fitted cng is better then any elseruns faster then any else car on cng my baleno does 110-130 on CNG in City with ac and on motorway 150-160 on ac
i own a Honda City 2003 EXiS. its an excellent car and mine has only done 35,000km. its a manual and is fitted with a landirenzo cng kit with 55kg cylinder and gives me 120km with AC in city limits and 130-140 with AC on motorway. performance wise the city is much more powerful as it has a Hyper 16 Valve engine and about 100hp. its got resale and is available in excellent condition used. u'll get one near Rs.580,000
city is more economical
City 2000-2003 is a Superb Car!The manufacturer of Baleno is Suzuki.No Offence for Suzuki Lovers.
city all the way
No comparison b/w Suzuki and Honda. Honda all the way I have Owned both Suzuki and Honda. Honda is far more reliable and powerful.
Baleno is more powerfull & has better acceleration compared to city and also braking of baleno is way better than city.The only thing which is against baleno is SUZUKI badge and its shape compared to city.
@ahm13, the 2001 City could literally blast a SE Saloon, give a decently hard time to a VTi in acceleration, a Baleno doesnt even compare.!It had a 1330 engine, redlined at 7K, was super light and was damn fast!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Hs_OvNJnQ
THIS VIDEO SPEAKS ALL.
and city blast a se saloon lolx
