Corolla1.3 MT 2015 onwards or City 1.3 2015 MT

[pwuser159161416255]

need a opinion about corolla1.3 MT 2015 onwards or City 1.3 2015 MT
for long routes.
In terms of
fuel average
service.
comfort.

[supraman2jz]

Would recommend a Corolla hands down.

Pros: Reliable, robust, very comfortable, (for some people) over assisted steering, low cost of maintenance.
Cons: No immobilizer so easy to snatch, Underpowered and dull to drive.

For long routes (personal experience, have driven 28hrs straight through Punjab, unknown random villages, towns, fog, rain, etc, did not get tired or fatigued.)
Fuel avg: Mine gave me 12-13kmpl easy (manual)
Easy service, you can find different quality of spare parts, from local Lahore made to OEM. Even OEM are not as expensive as Honda parts. These cars are as easy to service as a Mehran.
I find it to be very comfortable, a very old Americanized boaty ride. It eats up potholes pretty easy.
Also, contrary to popular belief, it handles and brakes just fine.

All of this is from personal experience, I am on my 2nd GLi, I also have a Civic to compare with.

[daniyalcars72]

for comfort ,durability the corolla is the way to go ..city 2015 is as the name suggests a city car it dissapoints big time on rural,broken roads due to its hard suspension and fragile components. for fuel avg both are same although city may have an edge due to a lighter body and better power to weight ratio.. city is only powerful at high rpms its low end torque is weak while the 1.3 corolla is opposite.

[roboxx]

On Fuel average both are not same. City is way more economical in terms of fuel consumption. For long routes (on motorway) City is better. Yes comfort wise Corolla is better.