First, me not a fan of A drive, I am an advan dB fan, because that tire deserves every penny you pay for it.
Secondly, I say SP sport 9000 SUCKKKSSSS big time, its hard, its friggin noisy, its rotational, it provides normal type road grip which can otherwise be achieved by using advan dB or bridgestone MY01. Why put on a loser tire then?
Thirdly, that thread u posted, LMAO.
I have used both and IMO there is no comparison between the two. SP Sport is garbage as compared to Advan dB in comfort, drive, braking, noise and control. The only downside may be that since it is a lot softer, tread wear may be quicker.
FYI I have Dunlop LM702 in two of my cars. Its OK, but not better than Advan dB or Continental cc5 (not good for wet braking, excellent otherwise) which I have in my other two cars.
SP300 is pure crap IMO:), not comparable to any of the above. I have experience of several sets of SP300 since 1999. They must be the worst tires that Dunlop makes
Usman, Yokohama advan db is a tire of its own kind. Its more then excellent in performance, low road noise, comfort etc.
Only if you can extend your budget to 12,500. You'll be more than happy. My civic rides like feather and performs like a grippy monster on both wet and dry surfaces.
i am using yoko advan db , it is one excellent tyre
Dude please. Dunlop sp sport is an average tire. Yokohama advan DB is much more superior.
Otherwise Continental ContiComfortContact 5 is better than advan DB. I have installed them in my car. They are bit pricey but surely worth the money.
hahaha, where did anyone praise the sp sport 9000 or even sp sport? LOL...
And oh, USA main mercedes S500 taxi chalti hai and we use it as a luxury car... tch tch tch...