This is where T3 inverter brings an edge, in my experience (practical, not tech specs/EER gimmicky experiences).
It lowers the amps consumption very quickly due to way faster cooling in peak summers.
Plus keeping in mind Pakistan summer climate (upto 52C), global warming and loadshedding etc. It's wise and future proof to go for T3 inverter, as T1 is under powered (upto 43C) to begin with.
In Pakistan, there is loadshedding every 2-3 hours, so one needs a very powerful AC (rated at 52-55C) that cools super fast, reaching desired set point within an hour, to quickly lower the amps, for the next two hours.
T1 inverter takes 1-3 hours at 4-6-8A to reach desired set point at peak summers (40C+), and by the time it stabilises to low amps (2-4A), it's loadshedding time and then it has to start over again at 6-8A for next 1-2 hours. What is the savings in that?
T3 inverter reaches desired set point within an hour (be it 22-24C on 45C day) and then lowers the amps (2-4A) just after an hour of use and for the next two hours, it runs at 2-4A. More savings or less savings?
Personal experience with GREE Voila (currently overpriced junk), and Panasonic T3 inverter (18PKF, twice old than GREE Voila and with outdated R22). Both on upper floor.