Is honda accord cl9 better or mark X 2005?

[devilzpassion]

^^ i'd really appreciate it, if u left Corolla alone (for once)!!!

[Cylestyne]

You'd appreciate it alright-- but that doesn't mean I intend on doing it Coworlllaaaaaa!

[internal_auditor]

@Cylestyne
1. XLI is beast
2. Hang on my VTEC didn't kick in yet

How Funny is this

You are comparing 1.3 XLi with VTEC 1.6 VTi .. i guess

[Cylestyne]

Uh... no I am not. Those are just quotes. Might want to read a bit carefully first.

[internal_auditor]

Ok! naraaz mat ho yaar

[Hasan_82]

BOTH ARE HORRIBLE CARS. RE-BADGED VEHICLES.

SOFTWARE ISSUES
SPARE PARTS AVAILABILITY
CLASSIFIED "USED" TO THE CORE.
MINIMUM RELIABILITY.
NO PEACE OF MIND

PERSONALLY I WILL GO FOR A BRAND NEW 2007/2008 ACCORD ANY DAY, EVEN IF IT COSTS SOME EXTRA CHANGE. A BRAND NEW OR A SLIGHTLY USED USDM/THAILAND ACCORD IS A SENSIBLE, MUCH WISER CHOICE OVER CL-9 AND MARK-X ALWAYS.

[robby180]

WELL IN SOME FIELDS THE MARK X IS BETTER THAN THE HONDA ACCORD CL9 BUT IN SOME FIELDS THE HONDA ACCORD IS BETTER THAN THE MARK X

FOR EXAMPLE IN THE FIELDS OF COMFORT, RELIABILITY, BETTER PICK AND LUXURY THE MARK X WINS

BUT IN THE FIELD OF GOOD RESALE VALUE, GOOD EXTERIOR LOOKS AND COLOURS, BETTER CONTROL AND STABILITY ON ROADS BECAUSE OF LOW RIDE HEIGHT AND REASONABLE PRICE THE ACCORD CL9 TAKES THE LEAD AND THE ACCORD IS ALSO MUCH SPACIOUS THAN THE MARK X

OVER ALL BOTH ARE GREAT CARS BUT STILL I GO WITH THE MARK X BECAUSE IT HAS GOT A 2.5 L ENGINE WHICH PRODUCES 212 HP AND THE 3.0 L ENGINE PRODUCES 252 HP

WHERE AS IF YOU GO FOR THE ACCORD MODELS

SO ITS 2.0 L CL7 PRODUCES 155 HP

ITS 2.4 L CL9 PRODUCES 197 HP

AND ITS 2.0 L EURO R PRODUCES 217 HP

SO OFFCOURSE A MARK X IS BETTER THAN CL9 BUT ONLY IN THE FIELD OF POWER AND REMEMBER THAT POWER IS JUST ONE OF THE MANY FACTORS ON WHICH THE CAR DEPENDS!!!

[ali_shaikhis]

ppl i OWN a mark x,
i had a cl9 earlier.

THE DIFFERENce is HELL!!
MARK X IS MUCH BETTER THEN a ACCORD,
REASONS,
markx
REAR WHEEL (tht means u can drift,and by drift i dun mean wo handbrake waly drift the original rearwheel drift!)
BETTER DRIVE IN SMOOTHNESS DUE TO REARWHEEL DRIVE
2500c tht generates 219 bhp

0-100km/h 6.2 seconds(this is only 0.2 second slower then a 350 Z!!!!!!!!!!)
xtreme technology tht includes push strt options keyless entry.
TRACTION CONTROL tht controls the car 4m triping as sum1 posted earlier.
A V6 engine type
MOre SPACIOUS
MORE RELIABLE being a toyota
BETTER SUSPENSION COMFORT.
xtreme noise reduction.
active Electronic steering which keeps the steering very very light even if ur driving on 22 inch or 24 inch rims
BLUETOOOTh connectivity
PURE BEAUTY INSIDE! with its light blue lights which turn on automatically at night
A 6 speed gearbox! at trip!
automatically tints the rear view mirror if the light is to high 4m the back as in a person with hid's is behind u! so it will tint the rear view mirror
etc etc

HONDA ACCOR CL9
4 cylinder engine
FRONT WHEEL drive
BEAUTIGULL XTERIOR
NOt reliable
HARD SUSPENSION
drive it on bumps 4 a month and acord wont b able to bear it!
197 bhp
2400cc
uncomfortable seats(type of bucket)
less space

even a mark 2 is better then accord because a mark 2 is better in drive due to its rearwheel drive option
and mark x 2.5 has beaten an accord euro r on record.there was a huge bet by a large difference

and the handling issues ppl were talkin about , ppl reall drivers around the world like raer wheel cars because of there handling and front wheel cars under steer thts why drifter and racers dun use them.

name any powerful car around the world
mercedes s clas rearwheel
slr mclaren rear
sl rear
ferrari rear
bmw 7 series rear
though its luxury cars but if u press the pedal its not tht loud BUTT HELL FAST!

[Cylestyne]

RWD is not the basis for judging reliability. Although I agree that Mark X is better some of your theory here is flawed:

'Toyota=More reliable', rubbish. Toyota engines have more breakdowns period. There has NOT BEEN ONE CASE IN HONDA'S HISTORY OF A VTEC ENGINE FAILURE.

Secondly- Europe's most reliable engine is the Honda F22 (S2000's engine). Surprising that this rank is held by a SPORTS car!

Some other stuff:
-Even the accord is EPS equipped.
-Comparing the Mark II to an Accord or atleast CL9 is a silly idea.
- Even Accords have Bluetooth FYI

Overall:
The features/luxury option of the Mark X are greater. But the '219' horses really feel like zilch. The Accord CL9 is faster anyday.

[HumanGenius]

@zianadeem1

SORRY I couldnt reply earlier!

But anyways, youre now talking about the older shape rolla (99,00) which I actually like a lot, perhaps the only rolla since 1966 Ill ever like!

I dont know much about that though so I cant comment, but theres no way in this world that a stock 2004 1.6 Vti can lose to a stock 2004 1.6 Se Saloon, esp in auto cuz i know a lot more abt it. In manual, extremely unlikely cuz Hondas are kind of designed on the sportier side and it just doesnt seem realistic for it to lose to an equal engine sized rolla. Especially that "cow" shape.

APart from the engine, transmission and other performance areas, lets look solely at the aerodynamics of the car. The 00 shape is just fine, but the 2001+ is not! Its too high and the curves arent designed for aerodynamics, however Civics 2002 shape and esp 2007 shape are extremely good in terms of the body design.

THe design is such that assuming you have the same driver, same engine and same transmission model in the frame of a 06 rolla and in the frame of a 06 vti, theres just no way the civic can lose. The aerodynamics in a civic are way superior the pregnant cow rolla.

Get my point,

[HumanGenius]

@cylestyne

Honda NEVER had an engine breakdown! Masha Allah, I always knew there was some bold reason for my "strong" love for Honda...! Yep, theres really no car parallel to Honda, and the only above is BMW

[Garrisonian]

Dont know about Mark X 2.5 but Mark X 3.0G is really a fast machine having 3GR-FSE & CL9 can never beat it!!!!
The 3GR-FSE engine rated at 245 hp (188 kW) at 6,200 rpm and 314 Nm at 3600 rpm.

regards

[ali_shaikhis]

DUDe in the simplest words
mark x has beaten accord EURO R which is manual and is faster version of accord.
though i agree honda's engine reliability is by gr8 means appreciated!

But hav u evr considered y the hell in the world r there no honda's as taxi's!!
ans:becuase it isn't strong enough!!!and by strong i mean 1.suspension is meant for roads only
2.If u put sum heavy weight ppl and fill the honda it wont b able to survive long.
3.Honda's WERE not spacious enough till 2006 but the new honda civic is considerably spacious.

and the best part u know wat exactly does the word civic means
CIVIC: of or relating or belonging to a city
2.of or pertaining to a city.
so u cant take it off road and u cant use it tht roughly then u can use a mark2.
and there is no freaking way tht a honda accord cl9 could beat the markx 2.5
i had an accord cl9 i know how it feels but when i drove the mark x it is a completely different animal the drive is so calm and civilized!
tht was the reason i sold the accord and got a mark x!!

[anonpak]

If sales records and quality reports mean anything, then Honda is A LOT better. Read this:

http://japancarblog.com/2007/12/the-best-american-cars-are-japanese/

The only people that like Toyotas tend to be old taxi drivers or young college students.

[syed_avais]

@ali_shaikhis
i agreed " the mark x it is a completely different animal the drive is so calm and civilized!"

docebzz must go for mark X its very differnt then cl9 or euro ver
And Mark X is also one of my favourite car

[freakridemaniac]

Though Accord is my fav, Mark X is of next STANDARD! (: