Meet My Gorgeous 11th Gen Corolla ALTIS 1.6 Facelift

[InNoCeNt_DeViL]

Thanks for the detailed advice. Now either i would go for complete taiwan kit or just the side skirts.
Now If i go only for skirts then are chineese ones good enough? I know taiwan would be better but would there be a clear difference in finishing and looks in side skirts also?
Could you share me the details of your painter plz ?
I know i am asking a lot of question but your answers would be highly appeciated and a great help to me.

Sent from my iPhone using PW Forums

Yes you can get chinese ones

[InNoCeNt_DeViL]

You have made a mistake.

You are also in this business for more than a year now
I would really appreciate your sincere guidance
And whats the mistake ?
This is not the right time of importing since the duties are going up in 2016 upto 80k , is that my mistake ??
Or 2016 is the Lot no ??

[silentassassin1]

You are also in this business for more than a year now
I would really appreciate your sincere guidance
And whats the mistake ?
This is not the right time of importing since the duties are going up in 2016 upto 80k , is that my mistake ??
Or 2016 is the Lot no ??

The whole idea of stepping into the business is wrong. Dealers and buyers giving terrible prices. Apna khud sab stock for sale para hwa. You will regret investing money up here. Rather you could have indulged in something like parts.etc bas yeh stock clearing karke kaam band kar dena.

[InNoCeNt_DeViL]

The whole idea of stepping into the business is wrong. Dealers and buyers giving terrible prices. Apna khud sab stock for sale para hwa. You will regret investing money up here. Rather you could have indulged in something like parts.etc bas yeh stock clearing karke kaam band kar dena.

ALLAH PAK behtari aur Asaani farmayega
IN SHA ALLAH
achi Niyat se kaam shru kiya hai
ALLAH ne chaha to jaaiz Nafa bhi hoga aur buyer satisfy bhi ..
Baki lets see obviously agar profit nae hua to phir nae mangwaonga aur cars
Mira ka plan horaha tha but ab thora ruk jata hoon

[silentassassin1]

ALLAH PAK behtari aur Asaani farmayega
IN SHA ALLAH
achi Niyat se kaam shru kiya hai
ALLAH ne chaha to jaaiz Nafa bhi hoga aur buyer satisfy bhi ..
Baki lets see obviously agar profit nae hua to phir nae mangwaonga aur cars
Mira ka plan horaha tha but ab thora ruk jata hoon

Yaar iss mulk mai konsa kaam niyat se hota jaiz? Apna bhi yahi idea tha but thore profit ke bajae nuksaan hai bohat idar. I will suggest you to stay away from this import stuff as much as possible if you dont want to loose your money.

[InNoCeNt_DeViL]

Update :

After almost 24k kms
And 15.5 Months

The original battery that came with the car finally after completing its life became dead all of a sudden last week
When i came back from a shop and tried to start the car around 10 pm , there wasnt any response even the ignition lights were dim
So jump started the car
And next day changed the battery

Got phoenix battery for 5000/-

[InNoCeNt_DeViL]

Ok Guys
Today i found out that IMC has totally mislead ppl in comparing Corolla Gli AT 1.3 with City Prosmatec 1.3
In one of the comparison brochures , shared by our dear member @umair2203 in Corolla's official thread
I still remember when 11th gen Corolla was launched last year , there were some posts about comparison of these two in which it was clearly mentioned that
0 to 100 of GLi AT was 17 seconds
And City 17.8 seconds

Now here is my observation
I have checked and made 0 to 100 videos of both the cars
City Prosmatec 1.3 is around 3.25 to 3.5 seconds faster than Gli AT
My Gli AT took around 16.5 seconds
And City 1.3 Auto did it in about 13 , 13.2 seconds
And felt faster than Gli AT ( both with full throttle )
Gli AT had 888 kms on the odo when i checked it
And today when city was at 996 kms i checked the 0 to 100 timing

[ptvgrind]

Ok Guys
Today i found out that IMC has totally mislead ppl in comparing Corolla Gli AT 1.3 with City Prosmatec 1.3
In one of the comparison brochures , shared by our dear member @umair2203 in Corolla's official thread
I still remember when 11th gen Corolla was launched last year , there were some posts about comparison of these two in which it was clearly mentioned that
0 to 100 of GLi AT was 17 seconds
And City 17.8 seconds

Now here is my observation
I have checked and made 0 to 100 videos of both the cars
City Prosmatec 1.3 is around 3.25 to 3.5 seconds faster than Gli AT
My Gli AT took around 16.5 seconds
And City 1.3 Auto did it in about 13 , 13.2 seconds
And felt faster than Gli AT ( both with full throttle )
Gli AT had 888 kms on the odo when i checked it
And today when city was at 996 kms i checked the 0 to 100 timing

Bro u have bigger tiers on corolla they are not stock euros thats why maybe. But city is light weight n will always be faster than gli

[ofkhan]

Bro u have bigger tiers on corolla they are not stock euros thats why maybe. But city is light weight n will always be faster than gli

Why should 0-100 be the only criteria. There is more to it than quick acceleration

[Nabeel_Ali]

Bro u have bigger tiers on corolla they are not stock euros thats why maybe. But city is light weight n will always be faster than gli

Yes. 17 inch rims on my 1500cc Fielder decrease it's accelerator drastically. It took 3 secs more to reach 100.

And now 16" rims will be a huge burden on 1300 cc engine that too automatic.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

[silentassassin1]

Yes. 17 inch rims on my 1500cc Fielder decrease it's accelerator drastically. It took 3 secs more to reach 100.

And now 16" rims will be a huge burden on 1300 cc engine that too automatic.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

I have used 16 Inch on 1300cc Manual. No difference 205 55 16

[Nabeel_Ali]

I have used 16 Inch on 1300cc Manual. No difference 205 55 16

You have to notice to see the difference. Plus in manual one can generate power. In automatic things are quite different.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

[zuhaibafzal]

Why should 0-100 be the only criteria. There is more to it than quick acceleration

Gli only wins in comforts

Sent from my iPhone 6S using Tapatalk

[InNoCeNt_DeViL]

Bro u have bigger tiers on corolla they are not stock euros thats why maybe. But city is light weight n will always be faster than gli 

Bro there is no difference as such
My 8th gen civic had same result with both stock ones and 215/50/R17
And even if we assume theres a difference that wouldnt be more than 1 second and due to speedometer error with bigger tyres the car would show 100km/h but in reality it would be at 95km/h
Theres a difference of 3 seconds atleast if we compare both and city takes the lead here

[InNoCeNt_DeViL]

Gli only wins in comforts

Sent from my iPhone 6S using Tapatalk

No
Overall GLi is a better car
Not only in comfort but in other aspects too
But just lacks the quality unfortunately

[zuhaibafzal]

No
Overall GLi is a better car
Not only in comfort but in other aspects too
But just lacks the quality unfortunately

Other aspects like?

Sent from my iPhone 6S using Tapatalk

[InNoCeNt_DeViL]

Yes. 17 inch rims on my 1500cc Fielder decrease it's accelerator drastically. It took 3 secs more to reach 100.

And now 16" rims will be a huge burden on 1300 cc engine that too automatic.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

According to the a senior official at IMC
When i was there at the time of launch and when i took test drive of Gli AT for the very first
Even he himself said GLi AT does 0 to 100 in 17 seconds which is good enough for daily routine use family sedan
He further said if you really want the driving pleasure then pls try our grande

[Nabeel_Ali]

Bro there is no difference as such
My 8th gen civic had same result with both stock ones and 215/50/R17
And even if we assume theres a difference that wouldnt be more than 1 second and due to speedometer error with bigger tyres the car would show 100km/h but in reality it would be at 95km/h
Theres a difference of 3 seconds atleast if we compare both and city takes the lead here

1.8 engine can bare the burden of bigger rims but below that things are different.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

[silentassassin1]

Bro there is no difference as such
My 8th gen civic had same result with both stock ones and 215/50/R17
And even if we assume theres a difference that wouldnt be more than 1 second and due to speedometer error with bigger tyres the car would show 100km/h but in reality it would be at 95km/h
Theres a difference of 3 seconds atleast if we compare both and city takes the lead here

You are wrong here a bit. Speedo calibration is effected like if you are at 100kmh it will show 95kmh. Btw digital meters dont face such issues

[InNoCeNt_DeViL]

1.8 engine can bare the burden of bigger rims but below that things are different.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

But 0 to 100 timings with stock tyres is 17 seconds !
You can check it yourself