TESLA did not program the cars to use full potential of the battery. I was reading an article showing that in case of a previous TSONAMI in USA (did not remember the name of state) people with TESLA were stuck in a charging situation where company remotely increase the total mileage of the cars and direct them to proceed to next charging station.
Sorry, i got confused with that alto matt. For city too I won’t recommend this as city takes 3.7L Total or Honda Genuine is good enough for it 0W20 else 5W30.
Thank you for your kind recommendation.
how much was it?
7500 from parts Central
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
As they say: Shauq da koi mul.nahi....
Do check my Upgrades
My cars 0-100 timing.
It was the same before i reckon but ii would like to check with other 1.5 owners to confirm this. What's your cars 0-100 ?
Looks like 10.5 secs to me. That's closer to the 1.8 civic, pretty cool. That's like 3-3.5 secs quicker than the stock 1.5 AT as per Pakwheels, which did in 14.07 sec.
Well, not really. It's almost 11s i would say.Civic does it in 10.1 seconds and that's a lot of difference i would say.That Pakwheels review is flawed . Just look at that video and mine and you'll see that the car being used in that review is not floored properly and as a result 2nd gear is changed earlier then it should have been.
Hmmm, what's the stock 0-100 then for 1.5 AT?
This is what i want to confirm from other 1.5 users. I reckon it's somewhere between 11-11.5
9-10 seconds isn't possible Please check and make a video if possible.
If it does in 11 - 11.5 secs, then 0-100 timing isn't greatly affected. Do you feel a better mid response now?
Response is definitely better. A little remapping doesn't really affect the 0-100 timing but has lovely affects on your driving experience . Also, if my car is doing it in 11s and stock in ,lets say 11.2 seconds , it's still a good improvement.
