I am giving you an example - im not comparing the two - use common sense - the comparison being given is between two engines of the same displacement produced by mercedes benz. One has torque in the mid range and one has torque in the peak range.
The mid range torque engine is more useful in everyday life and runs for incredible mileages (mine is nearing 288,000 kms and still is a running champion)
I have taken a POS 0.66 litre kei car on the highways and punjab motorway in Pakistan - they were 5 passengers in total plus luggage, the turbo was shot after our journey and the engine oil was cooked beyond usage - In the end the repair cost plus fuel plus irritation plus wastage of time replacing the POS turbo and sorting out the engine and transmission were far more more expensive than if we had simply used a corolla/corona/civic/accord
When I have a requirement of transport I dont try to wing a situation - e.g. if I want to drag a 5 ton load I wont tie it behind my sedan, I will get the truck out and tie it up to it.
I repair automatic transmissions - and have been doing that in Pakistan too, the CVT you are so praising is not exactly economical when it comes to repairing. and the ever so loving low rpm that you claim is not quite useful because you may cruise at no load for a short distance (the CVT will go into max overdrive) but because your engine it gutless at low rpm the ECU is programmed to force the CVT to go to quite a lot of underdrive in order to raise rpm and get going again.
You are in love with 0.66 litre kei cars - I cannot change that. The fact of the matter is that you will overlook all its failures to justify it. I know its useless to argue over the internet because 99% of Pakistani drivers think that spare parts mean replacement (of unknown origin) hard parts and consumables, whilst all other parts are not considered spare parts (like finishing, drivetrain, HVAC, safety etc - and 100% of the times Im pointed to "scrap market") - Im not a scrap market person and never was even in Pakistan.