Fuel average practically achieved for corolla variants

musalmankhan88 (Muslim Khan) 2019-06-17 20:46:27 +0500 #1

Hi
Can you please mention fuel average that you have practically witnessed in corolla variants, in city and high way, new vs 5 years old. Especially for
1- GLI 1.3 manual recent shape
2- GLI 1.3 auto recent shape
3- GLI 1.6 auto
4- Altis 1.6 manual
5- Altis 1.6 auto old
6- Altis 1.6 recent shape
7- Altis 1.8 manual
8- Altis 1.8 cruiserronic
Which ever you have used or personally witnessed.

Also does aging affect all engines equally or bigger engines mileage decreases more compared with smaller engines?

drmoh8683 (Dr Moh) 2019-06-17 21:46:39 +0500 #2

Gli auto 1.3 facelift 10.5 to 11 in city and 13.5 to 14 on motorway with speeds varying between 120 and 140....

Arsl984 (Arsl984) 2019-06-17 23:20:48 +0500 #3

I have similar figures.but car average shows marked improvement at 90 kph around2500 rpm .

sufyanjaved1 (sufyanjaved1) 2019-06-18 08:38:03 +0500 #4

Altis 1.6 recent shape (facelift) 11 to 12 using Islamabad expressway with RPM hovering around 2. and on Motorway depending on speed...... with speed 100 to 110km/h you will get 15 to 16.. with more speed you will get less fuel mileage.

rajaahmed96 (Ahmed ) 2019-06-18 09:30:56 +0500 #5

Gli Auto 1.3 7-8km/l in city with full time AC. Gli 1.3 manual 10-11km/l in city with full time AC.

umairalizafar (Umair ) 2019-06-18 10:07:42 +0500 #6

Altis CVTi Cruisetronic 1.8 2015, on speeds of 100-110 KPH, 16.5-17.5 km/l, RPM around 2. Got 19 too, once, but that seems to be an outlier.

fastian04 (Salman) 2019-06-18 10:22:28 +0500 #7

Facelift Grande, 11-11.5 kmpl in city..Lahore... 14-14.5 on highway..speed at 130-140kmph

musalmankhan88 (Muslim Khan) 2019-06-18 10:27:23 +0500 #8

So Auto 1.3 is a burden on fuel

musalmankhan88 (Muslim Khan) 2019-06-18 10:28:27 +0500 #9

Thanx alot

musalmankhan88 (Muslim Khan) 2019-06-18 10:28:56 +0500 #10

Wow thats quite impressive

umairalizafar (Umair ) 2019-06-18 10:40:59 +0500 #11

The real struggle is driving that car at such slow speeds

fastian04 (Salman) 2019-06-18 11:05:11 +0500 #12

Btw m i m giving u calculated tank to tank mileage. My meter shows the values, which others are claiming. I don't have any trust in meter... pretty wrong figures

dayrider (dayrider) 2019-06-18 11:22:02 +0500 #13

tank to tank at 120, grande does 16kml, atleast mine does.
locally in islamabad, mostly highway use, it does around 13.5-14kml

fastian04 (Salman) 2019-06-18 11:30:00 +0500 #14

Bro my route is congested and also Lahore traffic is worse compared to isb.... that's the reason for low mileage:(

danishmmh (danishmmh) 2019-06-18 11:30:23 +0500 #15

Tank to tank maximum achieved 17.4Kmpl with 20% AC Speed not more than 80, averaging max 60, very careful and slow acceleration. Within City

Normally averaging 14 to 15 kmpl with slow AC.

rajaahmed96 (Ahmed ) 2019-06-18 12:50:41 +0500 #16

Yes as i have both 2018 Gli auto and manual. Auto is sluggish and has bad fuel economy then my Honda Civic Vti Oriel Prosmatec 2015.

umairalizafar (Umair ) 2019-06-18 13:31:21 +0500 #17

Mine are also tank to tank.

fastian04 (Salman) 2019-06-18 13:34:16 +0500 #18

Sahii
Baqi i drive with normal foot..and sometimes heavy foot. No hypermiling at all. Seedhi si baat hai Grande ab main alto ki tarah nhn chalanay wala :)..theek hai mileage wasay

umairalizafar (Umair ) 2019-06-18 13:58:53 +0500 #19

Yes that's true, the only reason I get this is because I simply use the Cruise Control on motorway and relax a bit, so speed mostly at a constant. I didn't mention city average because I live a little to the side and the 5 km patch of clear highway like road means that my numbers are not what most people would get. Inside city, I guess I would get the same as u do.

fastian04 (Salman) 2019-06-18 14:00:54 +0500 #20

Mine is driven 90 % inside city