Hyundai Elantra; Dedicated Discussion, Owner/ Fan Club Thread

[mgalaxy3]

No need of these conspiracy theories. 10k km is a very short interval it’s just 8000 miles. There’s no fully synthetic oil that cannot do this bare minimum.
And yes they indeed are fully synthetic fully certified oils like caltex/havoline ProDS and total, you claiming otherwise does not mean anything. N oil doesn’t have to be 100% pao iv. They’re almost always blends. Only some extended mileage oils rated for 25000km+ in single change have a bit higher % of pao iv. Also these oils are sold not only in Pak but entire regions like asia pacific. Nothing makes liqui moly superior and their ancient semi synthetic oils are even worse.

Also doing 10k kms absolutely fine on full synthetic havoline API SP dexos1 Gen2. This is not extended drain interval oil which STARTS from 25,000km—nobody does that in Pak with OEM filters.

[roony]

Without an oil analysis any claim that oil can do this or that is speculation. MY opinion, no need to get hyped up and say im spreading some conspiracy theories. We cannot put a number on it that you can change at this inverval, a highway driven car and one that does all bumper to bumper traffic, intervals should differ.

And did I say LM was superior? I myself tried it long ago then switched to havoline and total quartz. I was clearing some misconception where some people think fully synthetic written on the bottle is pao iv and germans oils semi synthetic is something else. Its the same standards which are perfectly fine. Change at whatever internval you want.

[lazers]

Has anyone used Optimum No Rinse Wash and Shine
how does it helps to clean the car without water ? What about swirl marks ?

[abdulmoizpro.cr7]

See where we at now. This comment aged poorly

[danyalag6]

If you buy a horse, obviously it's upkeep will cost you more than if you bought a donkey. You can't use that to justify a donkey being better than a horse.

On a serious note your argument is absolutely useless, W211 E classes are considered to be the most reliable mercs ever made and they came with a multilink rear suspension. There are plenty more examples of cars using multi link suspensions that are quite reliable. Evos, Stis, Audis, all have extensive offroad capabilities and they have multilink or double wishbone suspension setups. And there are plenty of these cars that are still on road from the early 90s even.

Please stop being a fanboy for corolla, and start to accept the fact that the torsion beam is not as good of a suspension even when it comes to offroading. You cannot possibly believe that you know more than the people who actually make these cars and spend thousands of dollars in R&D to find the best suspension geometries and setups. If rally cars have been using multilink setups since the 80s then yeah its a much better and more refined suspension than corolla.

[fastian04]

true.. btw CAMRY has always been a multi link setup and is one of the most reliable and long lasting cars globally.

[daniyalcars72]

stop yapping about and accept the facts there is a reason why this car beats every sedan in sales in countries like pakistan, uae you cant go wrong with toyotas most reliable out of any other car maker ..the donkey is the one giving issue of steering racks and poor build qualities.

[fastian04]

hahahh do u know new corolla sedan doesnt offer torsion? because its shit... its cheap and crap in drive. relaibility is now similar in all good brands. You cross has more steering claims percentage last year than civic in Pakistan even

[danyalag6]

Old corollas from the 90s (E100) also did not use torsion beam suspension but instead had a trailing arm type suspension, and those are the corollas people usually think are the most reliable(They also handled better than the shit nowadays). Later Toyota switched to torsion beam to cut costs, not to improve durability or anything lol.

Be a man and accept when you have made a mistake, because you have literally zero talking points.

[daniyalcars72]

yeah keep yapping on heresay .. i showed you the credible internet result as proof and here you are yapping about like a fangirl ... no proof no legitimacy all talk . now when you saw the picture your changing the topic and went back to 1990s haha ..zero sense or legitimacy in your statements tbh no solid proof nothing just bias.. your logic literally got demolished after the reply .. the topic was of multi link being more durable then torsion beam to which i replied to you with proof .. didnt say nothing about trailing arm etc etc you are changing the topic now . anyways lets switch back discussion to hyundai instead of suspensions now.

[danyalag6]

Googling something counts as proof these days I can show you google results of the Earth being flat too, doesn't mean its true. It is so apparent you're not over the age of 16 lol.

[daniyalcars72]

so you want me to believe you over the internet whose logic is less then a 12 year old .. accept that you were wrong on the whole suspension debate lol its that easy .. now your changing topics and bringing in 90s corolla and im 20 plus thats why talk with facts while your all heresay most of it .. and google wont show you earth is flat you'l have to go on some bias website to show its flat im still waiting for your proof data on how multilink is more reliable ..all was bias .

[kameetaha]

Pak vs Ind
Danyal vs Daniyal

[shahsalam11]

In case someone feels that rear shocks / suspension of Elantra 2021 is hard or harsh at speed breakers

After 3 years I found out that rear shock absorbers have too long Bump Stop in 2021 Elantra.

I shorten them by cutting a portion at bottom of Bump Stops at rear and Bamm!

Smooth ride. No harsh bumps. Night and day difference in ride

In fact Hyundai installed large bump stops to give sporty driving experience but ruined ride quality

I recommend change your car rear bump stops to smaller/softer ones. or simply cut them

[tech_wiz]

Get it to your head that the #1 benefit of torsion beam is to reduce manufacturing costs. Apart from it, it has practically ZERO benefits. ZERO.

Even Toyota stopped using Torsion beam in new Corolla. Camrys have had independent suspension for ages now. So Toyota forgets the benefits of Torsion beam when they make Camry, Mark X, Crowns, etc.?

You are not only wasting your own time but everyones time here by posting this stupid stuff again and again.

[daniyalcars72]

yeah thats why it lasts longer then a multi link ? toyota also stopped giving na v8 in lc it has nothing to do with this debate .. simple answer is the advantages witch in todays time is more with multi link then a torsion beam because toyota has perfected its multi link suspension and now giving in most of lineup but it doesnt change the fact that its less durable then a torsion beam which is the older suspension and the debate was exactly on this topic that which suspension last longer so no its actually stupid to argue on the reliability of a multi link vs torsion ..you can only say that the multi link gives better grip,handling benifit thats it so you are wasting time. i didnt say that one is better then the other i only said that in durabilty torsion beam is better suited any day and some people rushed to nullify this statement but failed .

[daniyalcars72]

dont worry both are pak anyday.

[fastian04]

bro.. u won...