And you want to compare the losses in this accident because?
This is NOT a head on collision which shows the strength of both cars. The Corolla had a frontal impact which is the designed and engineered to the best standards plus the engine in the middle reduces the exerting force aimed towards the cabin. Where as City has MORE damage because
1) It was stationary [Not moving, thus didnt had an energy to hit corolla]
2) Its totalled from behind where the cross-sectional area of boot space is far less then engine compartment and the boot was "EMPTY" thus the COROLLA wouldnt be facing any problem in crushing the empty boot! Since it had nothing to Stop it.
Comparing the frontal collision of corolla with rear collision of City and then making up a conclusion that City is crap is idential of saying "Apples taste better then Oranges" :S
And i thought we have some automobile guru's on pakwheels. :S