My New Honda City Prosmatec 2K17 😎

Tags: #<Tag:0x00000009c848e0>

z.u.m.a (Hamaad 😎) 2017-03-19 00:02:44 +0500 #262

No other timing technology is as famous as Honda's VTEC.
Heck no one knows VarioCam it is developed by Porche or VANOS by BMW.

pwuser148440473555 (Pakwheels User) 2017-03-19 00:04:20 +0500 #263

Vtec is famous for its fuel economy and for its power as well both things in a single packing...

pwuser148440473555 (Pakwheels User) 2017-03-19 00:04:53 +0500 #264

But vtec lacks low end torque... High end torque no match

z.u.m.a (Hamaad 😎) 2017-03-19 12:14:56 +0500 #265

Today I manually calculated the AVG.

The needle is almost at empty.
ODO reading is 691 Km.
Fuel amount since Day 1 =Rs 3800
Rs 3800/Rs 73=52 Ltr
691/52= 13.2 Km/l

And the AVG reading the car is showing is approximately same (~13) .MashAllah great fuel consumption.Totally satisfied
Car is 40% driven on long and 60% within city.with 25% A/C.

ahmadbilalchaudary (ahmadbilalchaudary) 2017-03-19 13:09:47 +0500 #266

Manual

ahmadbilalchaudary (ahmadbilalchaudary) 2017-03-19 13:02:47 +0500 #267

Exactly.. Oriel is ultra boring to drive because of no paddle shifters

pwuser148440473555 (Pakwheels User) 2017-03-19 15:13:36 +0500 #268

Even the hasn't done 5k yet and it's on the break in oil
It's the best I think.. After first oil change you will manage to get 14-15 InshAllah with a prosmatec one
Lucky there

pwuser148440473555 (Pakwheels User) 2017-03-19 15:06:58 +0500 #269

Bro if the oriel or turbo had the prosmatec tranny then I think they would be more fun to drive execpt than fuel economy... As cvt doesn't have that acceleration even when you floor the car responds like it's thinking what to do.. That's the thing I hate the most in cvt

mzainkhalid (mzainkhalid) 2017-03-19 19:06:04 +0500 #270

What is your review about the pickup of 1.3 prosmatec city? I have two options. 1.5 Aspire manual or 1.3 Aspire prosmatec. What would you prefer?

hondacityjan17 (HondaCityJan) 2017-03-19 19:26:57 +0500 #271

Go for Aspire 1.5 Manual. It has better average, more powerful engine, shorter delivery time and is cheaper then 1.3 Aspire PT

mzainkhalid (mzainkhalid) 2017-03-19 19:32:31 +0500 #272

And what about the average and delivery time of Aspire 1.5 A/T? Better than 1.3 A/T ya even worse?

hondacityjan17 (HondaCityJan) 2017-03-19 20:05:53 +0500 #273

Average of 1.5 AT is better but the delivery time is 5-6 months

z.u.m.a (Hamaad 😎) 2017-03-19 20:36:29 +0500 #274

Haven't driven 1.5 so no idea.But 1.3 Prosmatec isn't as bad as it is said to be.
People have gone too far criticising its acceleration.

samahir (salman ahmed aka cat) 2017-03-19 20:45:01 +0500 #275

White color is indeed very beautiful in city .in Corolla it looks ugly as hell

samahir (salman ahmed aka cat) 2017-03-19 20:46:31 +0500 #276

Yep there is not a lot of difference .have driven both 1.5 and 1.3 .no big difference. the prosmatec 1.3 runs perfectly . I have driven it till 100 . Best performance

uzairbilalkhan (Uzair Bilal) 2017-03-19 22:08:00 +0500 #277

All the people saying that the Civic X CVT feels boring. Drive one in S gear and floor it, Oriel or Turbo. You will be addicted

pwuser148440473555 (Pakwheels User) 2017-03-19 23:00:34 +0500 #278

Bro I'm a civic X lover.... But cvt is something new to us... It's too much hot yr I love it and love to own it... If it had paddle shifters then oriel would also be a fun for youngsters as we need to feel the shifts... Basically cvt is for fuel economy not for acceleration but it's voice is kinda booring just roaring....
But I love it as it is and it's fun to drive yrrr just cvt tranny is kinda boring for us without flappy paddle

pwuser148440473555 (Pakwheels User) 2017-03-19 22:55:37 +0500 #279

Just cvt tranny is new to us.. When it just becomes common no one will consider it boring as it has better fuel economy and not that bad in acceleration though

ahmadbilalchaudary (ahmadbilalchaudary) 2017-03-20 16:07:39 +0500 #280

No gear stimulations are boring. There is little to no driver involvement. Just push your feet. Boring. On the other hand turbo has paddle shifters and its great to drive. Thats why i would prefer 1.8 mt grande over oriel any day of the week.

pwuser148440473555 (Pakwheels User) 2017-03-20 16:43:24 +0500 #281

Hahahahaha personal choice.... If this comes to me even I dislike cvt but still I won't chooze any other car with the same price bracket over civic oriel...
Civic is a complete new and higher class man
Who said no driver involvement..
Ok I tell you my personal experience with Vitz 2010 cvt...
I was doing 0-100 on D
It roundabout gave me 15.9 seconds to do so..
Then I shifted to S and it gave me 15.8
Then I checked 0-150 on S it gave me 28 seconds while on D 0-150 it was doing in 27 seconds
Then I got a bit experience that when the car feels like it's not running to much openly then just lift a bit of your foot from accelerator for microseconds and just floor it right away .. Just a bit.. You will feel like you have paddle shifters in the car or the car is automatic instead of cvt...
Then I checked 0-100 again on D by this technique
I first lifted a bit when car was 40 then at 80 assuming it to be an automatic
But I got right exact 15.7 seconds 0-100 by this technique but unfortunately this technique doesn't work on S.... S has better 0-40 acceleration than D but this technique worked for me though
In this way I minimized the boringness of cvt
But now I'm going for a manual city just to get fuel efficiency and performance when needed.. But my focus is on fuel economy.....
BTW Vitz wasn't that good on fuel too..