(((Pontiac to Porsche))) Pakistani's smart move..!

[ateekt]

@ tech_wiz:

Thanks for info man...! I appreciate it...!

@ humy:

Waiting for you to visit me man, as portage1 is coming in soon...! Hahahahahah....! Study and job man...! And also mad races... hahahah...!

[SAABi]

Tech_wiz:

U piss off too easy! GROW UP MAN!! BE SENSIBLE!

WHEN jeremy was driving the ENZO, he did try to shift down a gear, which the car refused. He had to try a couple of times in order to succesfully downshift the car!! U might as well try seeing it again! There he didnt abuse the ENZO just because it was a FERRARi!
Then cums the VANQUISH! He did say that it didnt downshift wen needed. In other words it didnt downshift as a manu car would wenever the driver desires to downshift.

U hav no idea since wen i started using the internet so u might as well SHUT YR PIE HOLE! And u might as well Broad'n yr thoughts, as not everyone FANCY DRAGS the most!

FURTHERMORE yr ground reality STINKS and so do u! Autos r not as fast on the track as the manual and they never will be!

If u classify Civics, citys, corollas, santros, margallas and swifts as dinkies, then u might as well wake up. DUDE in which world are u living??^o) I seriously doubt that the cars ive mentioned are dinkies! U might as well reconsider!

"Mr. PINHEAD" Ive just chkd supercars.net and i didnt state ne of the figures on my own, they were all "QUOTED" if u kno wht that means! If u think im lieing u might as well chk it yrself
Here, ill make it easy for ya!

ENZO: http://www.supercars.net/cars/1934.html

F40: http://www.supercars.net/cars/638.html

Even if u stated the correct figures, then y balme me?? i just said wht supercars.net stated! Even if r correct, its not me whose wrong..... its the "SUPERCARS.NET"
They have stated enzo's time to be 3.4secs and F40s as 3.8secs

I never said that the F40 is better since Jeremy likes one.... its tru that sice enzo is equipd with a lot of electronics and hence it is not as good as the F40. Enzo's gearbox might aswell be the fastest, but it is not as gud as the MANUAL stick tranny! Y?? U say Y?? Coz u cant DOWNSHIFT! I wud recommend u to see that very episode of enzo once again to see jeremy trying 2 to 3 times to downshift the ENZO! While driving the enzo, u will start feeling restricted, but not while driving the F40!

I pity u!
WEN one starts using abusive words, it means that one is pissed of, illiterate and has failed to convey his thoughts! JUST LIKE U!

U might as well buy sum time, coz if necesry.... I WILL WASTE MORE OF YR TIME! IF THATs WHT U CALL IT!

NO OFFENCE
REGARDZz

[tech_wiz]

Your long lutterly useless posts confirm you've lost the arguments here.

Who the F*** goes to Supercars.net? Why don't you move you lazy a** and check timings from official website! You're claiming as if supercars.net made Enzo.

To enlighten you here homie, 0-100 timings on these reviewer sites are given without, boot, without full tank and with one driver while those at official sites are given with 2 people in the car and a full boot.
Mercedes-Benz posts times with 2 people and a full trunk. Now it depends entirely on any reviewer site to include 1 person or 2 or full boot and null boot, etc.

You like manual trannys, sit on it and give your self a 360 degress spin

When you DON'T have the flexibility to listen to some information which someone older to you is giving, then you don't desever to sit infront of the pc in the first place.

avoid using abusive language @ Admin

[tauseen123]

tech_wiz Sir,

All over the world people consider the Independent Reviewer's Comments and Judgments about the car rather then the Info given by the Company, The Reason is Quiet obvious and I hope I do not Have to state iT here.

BTW:-
According to you, Companies test their Cars with One Passenger and Boot Full. According to you, the official Timings of 0-100 km/h of an F40 is 3.2s.

If the reviewer at SuperCars.net had No Passengers, A passenger with no Boot oR any other Combination They are Most probably To get a Time Lower then 3.2s.
Considering they obeyed the Rules which companies use They should have acheived more or Less the same Timing BuT they Didn'T. The fact iS that Companies always ALWAYs Overvalue their Products capability and iT iS noT EASY foR a Normal Consumer to Get the Same TiMiNGS oR same Efficiency from the Product as The Company Claims to have Acheived. An independent Reviewer gives us thiS biT of Information that iT iS noT that easy to reach the acclaimed ability of The Product.

Here Supercars.net took 3.8s to reach 100km/h, hhmmmm Maybe they tested F40 with a Trailer Attaced LMAO!!

All over the World people go to That Website to get Information. And Respected Sir, you are Stating that Website to be iRRelevant.

OKAY, iF that iS irrelevant then what about The many Other !!

Road tests have produced 0-60 times as low as 3.6 --
Source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrari_F40

3.8s @:-
http://www.seriouswheels.com/top-2006-Ultima-GTR-Speed-Record.htm

They don't seem to hit the 3.2s!!!

Sir jee, We are all here to Learn.

SAABi's utterly LONG Comments are noT useless, BuT your Short and Abusive Comments ARE !!

Admins:- Lets have a Poll at Homepage,
You are going to Buy an expensive Sports Car, Would you like iT Manual or Auto ??

R3GAR|)s.

[Storm]

Here we are arguing aout cars which we can't even afford.

Let's just chill and agree to disagree regarding the gearbox.

[SAABi]

AHH..... Tech_wiz (AUNTY)

U are simply no body to decide whether ive lost the argument! Secondly u are no BODY to judge, ne one as to ho won the argument or lost the argument! Thirdly, my long replies just dont seem to prove, as u stated, that i lost the arguments!

If u can say that my replies indicate that ive lost the arguments, then i too can say that yr short abussive posts PROVE that u are an enormous LOOSER! I believe yr abusive posts indicate that U LOST the arguments!

[SAABi]

Tauseen has certainly cleard everything regarding YR STUPID POINT OF COSIDERING OFFICIAL TiMiNGS. I would ask u to move yr LAZY BUMZz and start considering REVIEWR sites, rather than sticking yr BuTT to official sites!

Dont try to enlighten me here, as u r the one to be enlightened! Manual cars are tru FORM of life, Whtever u say!

I WOULD LIKE TO CLEAR OUT ONE MORE THING! U ARE NOT MY FATHER, SO STOP TELLING ME WHT TO DO, OR WHT NOT TO DO! FOR GO SAKES, U ARE 18 YEARS OLD! STOP ACTING AS IF U ARE 81! I'LL BE 17 THIS JUNE.... CHACHA U ARE JUST ONE YEAR OLDER THAN ME, U ARE NOT THAT OLD TO START DICTATING ME AS TO WHT I SHOULD DO OR NOT!

One must b reasonble! Its not nessecary that ne one older than me is always correct! And HEY, i did listen to u! I just dont blve u! AND regarding yr point of Autos better than MANUAL, DUDE U ARE SOOO WRONG!
AGAIN, u are no one to decide if i should sit in front of the computer of not!!

U are not the only one who can abuse! I, unlike u can can resist abusing! If u cant convey yr thoughts, stop abusing MATE!

IN THE END...
MANUAL CARS ARE STILL BETTER THAN AUTOS!

REGARDZz

[gem_guy]

@tech_wiz.....dude u were getting really offensive when u started commanding saabi with comments lyk....

I've driven more cars for real than the number of dinkies you've played with.

Dude, in short you don't know what you're talking about, just shut the fuck up and don't waste my god darn time!

and u were also offensiv to other pakwheelers when u said...

"I've been on PakWheels way before you starting using internet. The mental level of people i've seen here isn't beyond drags. Assuming you one of them, i quoted drag examples. "

Such things shud not be tolerated fellow PWers....

[gem_guy]

@tech_wiz again....
u just mentioned that companied test thier own car when they are fuly loasded....whereas reviewer test the same cars with only the driver aboard....

now my point...(u mite consider justifying it)..is that...why are u considerng the timings of the same car when it is fully loaded...and why not when it has the driver inside only??.....now dont tell us that ure gonna be racing an enzo on the drag strip or circuit or wateva u do....with ur whole family cramped in...and the trunk full of picnic stuff....LMAO....
be sensible dude.....

and once again....wud u mind explaining...why a heavily loaded F40 does 0-100 in 3.2secs and one with the driver only achieves the same feat in 3.8 secs??

dude either get ur facts rite...or think before u write here!!

[gem_guy]

and once again...manuals are the ultimate in performance!!!!

[SAABi]

RiGHT on GEM..........

[humy]

dear o dear, any of u ever had any experiences with a super car such as a porsche on auto AND manual.... look at ureselves..pathetic.

[gem_guy]

@ humy bhai....this is not pathetic dude....this is just reality...we are just trying to elaborate on facts here!

[SAABi]

Humy:

Its just not PATHETIC! One must respect tru art of racing! Which of course is manual DRIVING!

[SAABi]

tech_wiz:

Looks like sum 1 lost the arguments.... And i m DAMN sure its not me!

[gem_guy]

Manual was the best tranny ever...is the best tranny....and will remain for ever...!! look who lost the argument now!!

[tauseen123]

True spirit of Racing iS indeed in Manuals!

Every single Car Freak out there knows thiS ( I SUPPOSE ).

R3GAR|)s.

[SAABi]

Tauseen!

GRT PICTURE YAAR!! ANTH....

The pleasure the above posted picture gives u cannot b described! Its amazing wht this MECHANISM do to u!

It can surely take u to a new LEVEL!

REGARDZz

[tauseen123]

[SAABi]