Pakwheels
Download App via SMS

Suzuki APV GLX (CNG) Car Reviews

Overall Rating

4 Reviews | Write Review
  • Style 3-rating
  • Comfort 3-rating
  • Fuel Economy 3-rating
  • Performance 3-rating
  • Value for Money 4-rating

Recent Suzuki APV GLX (CNG) Car Reviews

Select Variant: Sort By:
Displaying all 4 Reviews
Suzuki APV GLX (CNG) User Review

Why expensive

Suzuki APV GLX (CNG)

Posted by umair504 on Feb 22, 2012

I have been using apv many years ago.A perfect car for family use,but why it is very over priced this is first car or van of suzuki which is very expensive good style and good engine.A good luxury 7 seater car.I have very good experience with this car
  • Style 4-rating
  • Comfort 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy 4-rating
  • Performance 3-rating
  • Value for Money 4-rating
Suzuki APV GLX (CNG) User Review

A Family Car

Suzuki APV GLX (CNG)

Posted by Umar Ali on Dec 19, 2011

I've been driving/travelling in an APV for almost 4 years now. (in fact i learned driving using this vehicle! )

Firstly lets get to the basics, the Price. Currently its a bit overpriced. Though i would still go for it as a family 7-seater over any jeep/vehicle in this price range.

Comfort: To be honest for an imported vehicle its not the most comfortable car. Though i have seen worse, much better than many Pakistani cars/vans. (and it has LOTS of SPACE! ) that's all that matters, i guess..

Consumption: On CNG its fairly cheap. Specially on long drives. On petrol its a bit expensive cause of the extra power due to the weight. But i'd prefer driving it on petrol all the time as its totally at a different comfort level on petrol! (though i don't pay for either, so i guess my opinion doesn't matter. My dad pays and he says its good on CNG :P )

Now to the other things that matter,

Power: it has lots of power! the 1.5L engine is just about the right size for this vehicle.

Safety: Here is where the APV looses most of its points. It has NO ABS! That really is the worst part. NO AIRBAGS! The tires, play an important role in keeping the car stable. if you change them to bigger ones, you might increase the comfort but decrease the stability! its fairly stable, as a teenager like me hasn't killed himself yet, using the vehicle. So its stable till that extent. Though after a few years it will be very risky to drive it over 120 km/h on the Motorway or anywhere for that matter, as it wobbles, and feels very unsafe.

Practicality: It is the best car in this section. It has LOTS of space for ANY type of luggage.. Though the CNG cylinder does take a bit of space in the back, there is still room to put two big bags behind the rear seats. You can easily fit 10 people in it. Though the people at the back will be a bit squeezed. Add one of those roofs to it and your luggage problem for these ten people is solved. (if each person has a bag )

Overall, it is one of the best Cars/Vans i've seen in Pakistan. And in this price range any other vehicle of it's type can not compete with it.

Though if you can manage the cost of fuel, i'd suggest getting a Prado or Pajero.. As they are more fun to drive and has way more power plus comfort. Only problem would be they'd be old and the APV would be brand new.
  • Style 3-rating
  • Comfort 3-rating
  • Fuel Economy 4-rating
  • Performance 4-rating
  • Value for Money 5-rating
Suzuki APV GLX (CNG) User Review

Why expensive

Suzuki APV GLX (CNG)

Posted by Muhammad Ali murad on Jun 27, 2011

its is expensive due to pak suzuki import it.it is not pak made like others.all pak suzuki cars donot have quality but apv and jimmny are quality cars.its air conditioner(AC) is amazing not like suzuki daba
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  • Style 4-rating
  • Comfort 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy 5-rating
  • Performance 5-rating
  • Value for Money 5-rating
Suzuki APV GLX (CNG) User Review

Suzuki Apv

Suzuki APV GLX (CNG)

Posted by Adeels1 on Apr 13, 2011

Suzuki Apv is a nice driven van but price is to much as compere to local marcket, i donot know that why Suzuki makes pak people foolish.
I donont comment on its performance........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Style 1-rating
  • Comfort 0-rating
  • Fuel Economy 0-rating
  • Performance 0-rating
  • Value for Money 0-rating