Pakwheels

Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC Car Reviews

Overall Rating

26 Reviews | Write Review
  • Style 4-rating
  • Comfort 4-rating
  • Fuel Economy 4-rating
  • Performance 4-rating
  • Value for Money 4-rating

Recent Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC Car Reviews

Select Variant: Sort By:
21 - 26 of 26 Results
Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC User Review

usman khalid

2014 Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC

Posted by Usman Khalid on Dec 26, 2014

Familiarity: I owned this car.
The 1.5 Litre City Aspire Prosmatec is a total disappointment.
Fuel consumption is approx 8km/l in city traffic and 12km/l on motorway. The fuel tank is only 42 litres and 70km/day driving in city implies refueling approx every 4 days - you are always at the petrol pump. The leather seats are poorly made, hard and tiring on long journeys. Getting into the front passenger side is an art - there is an ugly hump under the front seats which makes entry risky. If you happen to step on the hump, you will most probably slip and fall on your back. Glove box is so small and has a bulge of the lock inside along with 3 communication cables making it practically useless. The suspension is hard and very unpleasant on rough roads. There is no value for money in the 1.5 and the "Aspire" - better to buy the "Un-Aspired" 1.3. The car struggles on the Kalar Kahar slopes of the motorway. The fuel tank is under the front seats exactly where speed breakers rub a car's lower portion.
  • Style 3-rating
  • Comfort 1-rating
  • Fuel Economy 1-rating
  • Performance 2-rating
  • Value for Money 1-rating
Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC User Review

Honda City Aspire Prosmatic

2014 Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC

Posted by raosaab on Jun 06, 2014

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Dear all,, I bought my aspire a couple of weeks ago. Its pleasure to drive this car, it has all luxuries which are normally purchased from the market, like leather seats, alloys, Navigation etc.
As far as fuel economy is concerned,,, it gave me 13.5 km/l in first tank, 15 km/l in 2nd and now in my routine run from Mangla to Islamabad, it gives me 18kms per liter with AC on but no passengers with me. I'm hopeful that it will improve after the oil change,,,,with fully synthetic oil from Honda,,hopefully it should touch 20-21 km/l mark with AC on and 23-24 km/l w/o AC.
OVERALL,,,excellent purchase. Great pick, great comfort, great value for money and the Best thing,,Great Leg Space for the Rear Seats. And last of all,,,I'm getting my car filled after Fajar,,,so no problems with the gases,,,, Enjoy,,if you have ASPIRE,,,
  • Style 4-rating
  • Comfort 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy 5-rating
  • Performance 5-rating
  • Value for Money 5-rating
Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC User Review

Overall Very Good Car

2013 Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC

Posted by Waqqas Riaz on Apr 24, 2014

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Bought this car in Dec-2013. Exterior is very Nice and pretty looks

Positives are Interior is very much impressive with new leather seat and interior. Navigation works perfect and is very helpful during driving. I previously owned City 2010 model and Honda improved this model in many ways.

Fuel Economy is not bad. I have drove 2000 km and found it up to 15 on highways and 12.5 km/l in city.

Shocks are bit harder if I compare it with Corolla A/T 1.6. Earlier I was going for Corolla 1.6 A/T but due to many missing features I left it since in aspire you get all in the price (Prosmatec transmission, Navigation, Alloy Rims, Leather covers, etc) . Second reason as the shape is going to change in Corolla very soon.

Car is over priced like Corolla models. Plastic dashboard, hard suspension, missing fog lights are only disadvantage I see in this car.

Overall a very good family car for everywhere drive. Highly recommended if anyone really want a comfortable drive.
  • Style 5-rating
  • Comfort 3-rating
  • Fuel Economy 3-rating
  • Performance 4-rating
  • Value for Money 2-rating
Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC User Review

A pretty Decent car but expensive

2013 Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC

Posted by hash on Nov 10, 2013

Familiarity: I owned this car.
pretty well designed, even though a sunroof and fog lights would have been appreciated.

Interior of the car is pretty well designed.

Cars GPS is pretty damn accurate and very very helpful in islamabad and rawalpindi

The 1.5ltr engine is very very responsive and no delays in performance whatsoever.

The PROSMATEC (progressive shift management) lives upto expectiation. lovely automatic gearbox.

Handling is pretty well accurate, i would have appreciated if it had cruise control as i paid 1.8 million rupees for this car.

Value for money:? Not really, absolutely not 1.8 million car, but thn again, rupee is going down every second.

Pretty decent car. I bought it for my parents and they love it.
  • Style 5-rating
  • Comfort 4-rating
  • Fuel Economy 3-rating
  • Performance 5-rating
  • Value for Money 2-rating
The suspension of new City 2013 is required to be nice or in comfort rather than hard like cart. I am really very disappointed when I drive the car. Its steering is quite crispy and its dashboard is quite trim. Although its automatic gear transmission is quite good, good response on different torque levels. But still in the end its rear suspension required to workout by Company give comfort response.
  • Style 3-rating
  • Comfort 1-rating
  • Fuel Economy 4-rating
  • Performance 4-rating
  • Value for Money 3-rating
Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC User Review

Needs to re evaluate

2013 Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC

Posted by sadaqat on Aug 18, 2013

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Exterior: Good Looks lacks Fog Lamps

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort): Poor Quality Leather seats, No Fixed Ashtray, Wires for internet & charger badly placed in glove compartment, Navigation software poor quality(old version)

Fuel Economy: 9 KM in city 12 KM on motorway

Ride Quality & Handling: good

Final Words:I just done 2000 Km this was my dream car but shocked to see the poor performance of Navigation system.however still evaluating drive is nice,

  • Style 4-rating
  • Comfort 4-rating
  • Fuel Economy 1-rating
  • Performance 4-rating
  • Value for Money 2-rating