Pakwheels

Honda City Car Reviews

Honda City
Overall Rating

468 Reviews | Write Review
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money

Recent Honda City Car Reviews

Select Variant: Sort By:
391 - 400 of 468 Results
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC User Review

very fuel efficient

2012 Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC
4/5

Posted by Khankhail on Nov 01, 2012

i have city wid beige interior. it is a lovely combination of style and fuel economy due its light weight. however shocks seem bit hard but wid four persons on board it is e. secondly the shocks wont weaken wid cng kit. the shocks r hard de its light weight. talking about its interior it has beautiful interior wid good colour scheme. and gives remaining mileage, miles/litre, and average economy. on 3rd gear on level road at 50kph wid careful push of accelerator gave me 30km/litre widout any exaggeration.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC Prosmatec User Review

Overall Good Car

Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC Prosmatec
4/5

Posted by Nauman Ahmad on Oct 29, 2012

Well Corolla and City owners are just throwing bricks on each other. Both Corolla and Honda are good cars so please give honest reviews.

I own both GLi 2012 and Honda City Prosmatic (October 2012 model). So heres my experience about HONDA CITY.

Pros
1 - Very stylish looks.
2 - Fuel economy is excellent. My Prosmatic gives me 18 on Highways without AC provided I keep speed at 100 Km/Hr. Within city in lot of traffic its giving me 13-14 without AC. On the other hand Corolla Gli MANUAL due to its weight and bulk hardly gives me 12 within city and 14-15 on highways.
3 - Titanic interior now being offered is really stylish as compared to Corolla.
4 - Price is less as compared to Corolla. My prosmatic with company fitted Navigation/Multimedia cost me Rs 1,696,000 whereas Corolla Gli manual without any Multimedia/Navigation currently cost the same.
5 - Honda City is really quite while driving there is no engine sound at all. Its also really streamlined for effecient Airflow reducing air drag and noise. Corolla's engine on the other hand is not so quite.

Cons
1 - Seats are Hard and are not at all comfortable as compared to Corolla.
2 - Suspension is hard and seems much delicate than Corolla. Even in the first 1000 Kms I have realized that Honda City is not made for rough Roads. You have to take great care not to take it to bumpy roads. Corolla however, is made tough for any type of roads.
3 - Although more fuel effecient, engine seems to have less power as compared to Corolla 1.3.
4 - I have experienced minute knocking so I have to mix High octone as a remedy which solves the problem. Corolla's engine happily accepts any type of petrol without any knocking etc.

Conclusion:
If you travel alot on rough bumpy roads then Honda City is not the car for you. However, provided you stay on known/smooth/good routes than this car is probably the best possible option for you.

  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City User Review

Great Car, Dont try Corolla coz they theft loft of money

Honda City
4/5

Posted by Jawad Farooq on Oct 21, 2012

I have bought city after lot of research, at the end i finally decide City, it price was 1498 but they discount me 5k , corolla have same features but price is 1698 , its really not make sense

anyway i ride car its amazing but need change some my bad driving habits after that its giving me great millage and comfortable
thanks Honda
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC User Review

Suspension Crap -- Rest is fine

Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC
3/5

Posted by Fahd Shafiq on Oct 19, 2012

When you spend 1.4 million of your hard earned money you look for comfort, style and fuel economy to some extent as well. For me the experience so far is satisfying if not so great. The over all looks are good, although interior is made up of cheap plastic and even after using it for 14000KM in last 1.5 year it has never gave me major rattling noises. Fuel economy is good but the drawbacks are poor acceleration and really bad suspension. Suspension issue can be resolved by putting a better quality tyers with a bit more profile but that will not totally solve the problem and after buying this car you have live with the fact that it is just like this
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City User Review

Honda City Aspire

Honda City
4/5

Posted by arfanmahmood1 on Sep 29, 2012

Just bought Honda City Aspire and very much inspire with this ride. It's really very comfortable and new interior looks really nice with multimedia and navigation. Leather interior is also good. Sound system is also very good. In short there's no need to install any after market accessories. Only thing looks ugly in this ride is the tire, which didn't looks good on it's body. Fuel economy is also awesome and I hope I didn't install CNG in it.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC User Review

Great car

Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC
4/5

Posted by Syed Ibrahim Hussain on Sep 25, 2012

This model is remarkable. The elegant black interior is nice but it attracts lots of mosquitos. The pickup is awesome and the boot is bigger than a civic. The fuel economy of the car is really nice. If you compare this car with a Corolla, you'll find the city much better in every aspect.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC User Review

Corolla has just the comfort advantage over City thats it!!!

Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC
3/5

Posted by RN427 on Sep 13, 2012

City is more stylish than Corolla has cheap black interior, it now has got beige interior which is even better than Corolla's...City is really fun to drive, pick is great because when you are drving the VTEC kicks in and you enjoy it...Corolla has some major advantages over City that

Its Much more comfortable than City because as we all know that City has unfortunately got a hard suspension so the ride is less comfortable which i simply can't understand the actual reason behind this which only Atlas Honda knows because it is such a nice car, Sleek and Stylish but the reality is that the drive of Corolla isn't comfortable only its seats are comfortable which means the ride is comfotable but CITY IS THE CAR WHICH HAS GOT comfortable drive but uncomfortable ride quality and City is not a good performer on bumpy roads such as in villages and it can also not sustain heavy drives while Corolla has all these benfits!!!

Corolla has a bigger and solid body which is very durable for years while City is a bit sensitive in this case

Now coming to the other side City has good power to weight much better pick and a very smooth drive as the its engine horsepower and torque is more than Corollas!!!

City has got very cool colours such as Alabaster Silver, Taffeta White, Polish Metal, Deep Lapis Blue Metallic, Crystal Black, Habanero Red amd and Bold Beige Metallic!!!

and coming to the end i believe that the brakes of City are better than Corolla as they are ABS AND YOU KNOW Honda ABS is awesome!!!

So the conclusion of my review is that Corolla is a car for old people
while City is the choice for younsters!!!
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC User Review

Crap

Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC
1/5

Posted by umair333 on Aug 11, 2012

I was using Gli ecotec for last 4 months ....people say corolla is under powered and not economical.....

Drove the new city of my dad ... sharing my experienience.

1.City is having a very bad pickup or u say v.slow acceleration on petrol.
2.A/C of city is not chilling as compared to Corolla
3.Regarding fuel economy it was hardly giving me 1km more than corolla.
4.on rough roads it was totally messed up with fazool suspension.
5.It was knocking on petrol which is very much irritating.

Its plus points:

1.Front leg room and seating position is much better than Corolla.
2.Comfort of city is more on motorway and better roads because of its calm and quite engine.
3.Gear shifting is much better than corolla and clutch is also small.

overall instead of wasting money on this crap buy
1.xli or gli
2.civic on cng is much better than driving a city on petrol or buy Civic Hybrid.
3.go for axio as its seats,road grip,performance and build quality is far better than local altis.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC User Review

Crap

Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC
1/5

Posted by umair333 on Aug 11, 2012

I was using Gli ecotec for last 4 months ....people say corolla is under powered and not economical.....

Drove the new city of my dad ... sharing my experienience.

1.City is having a very bad pickup or u say v.slow acceleration on petrol.
2.A/C of city is not chilling as compared to Corolla
3.Regarding fuel economy it was hardly giving me 1km more than corolla.
4.on rough roads it was totally messed up with fazool suspension.
5.It was knocking on petrol which is very much irritating.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC User Review

my experience of city

Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC
3/5

Posted by Bilal on Jun 23, 2012

bit disappointed from i vtec city perfofmance.bought new city but it has knocking problem.works ok on high octane petrol.but very disapointed from its fuel consumption.city`s idsi version gives very good mileage.i don`t know why they gave ivtec engine n new city idsi was perfect. i owned both models and its my experience.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money

Get The PakWheels App

Buy & Sell Cars, Bikes and Auto Parts faster and better
using our App

Scan the QR
to get the App