Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC User Review

Good buy but still lacks

2018 Honda City Aspire Prosmatec 1.5 i-VTEC

Posted by Basil Masood on Aug 15, 2022

Familiarity: I owned this car.

I bought this car back in April 2022. I was shifting from a Honda City 1.3 Manual 2010 to this. The car is good in looks and performance. I took it to Naran recently and worked nicely. The only concerns are no airbags and a below par average. My previous City used to give me 14 in City so i was expecting since this is Automatic and a more powerful engine it'll atleast give me 12. but in reality its around 10 and below. The rest aspects of the car are perfect. There's no delay in power. Cabin noise is fine. Seating is also good. Road grip is ok too. Even at 140 on motorways it performs well.

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Honda City 1.5 i-VTEC Prosmatec User Review

Very bad fuel economy

2021 Honda City 1.5 i-VTEC Prosmatec

Posted by Usman Amin on Aug 14, 2022

Familiarity: I owned this car.

I had purchased honda city 2021 model in Rs 27.55 Lacs only for its good looks, the exterior is good but interior is not as good, even in the sound system, there is no access of bluetooth pairing and having no touch screen panel, even no back camera. I remember, as this car in 2016 was having price Rs 14.70Lacs and in 2021 it is coming with same features with no upgradation but in double price..

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Best Car

2009 Honda City

Posted by Muhammad Ahmad on Aug 11, 2022

Familiarity: I owned this car.

16 to 17 kmpl fuel economy at 120 kmph speed. But it should have come at least with led head lights, auto wipers, passenger seat belt warning, paddle shifterand auto dimming mirror. L gear is not good as it can go to 65 kmph at salt range. I doubt its performance while downhill from babusar top to chillas. it should have come with paddle shifter. over all road clearing is good

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Civic turbo

2017 Honda Civic Turbo 1.5 VTEC CVT

Posted by Rumail Randhawa on Aug 09, 2022

Familiarity: I owned this car.

most advance features,good performance,very fast and enjoyable car,its a good value for money.0t0100 in just 9 seconds,fuel average is also no very bad,performance is outclass.freedom to race with anyone on motorway,gives fuel average of 11km/l in city with ac and 14 km/l on highway,very futuristic and sporty exterior, comfort is also very good,i also face some problems,but all problems are solvable,

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Highly disappointing

2022 Honda City 1.5L ASPIRE CVT

Posted by Zishan Ahmad on Aug 06, 2022

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Exterior: Copy of Honda Grace; unimpressive look of trunk and backlights.
Interior: The manufacturer made every effort to reduce the cost. Entire interior fixtures are visibly of very low quality and function parts such as indicator handle, horn, trunk opener etc. everything is so hard as if a century old machine is at hand! Indicators and seatbelt alerts sound high and annoying; horn screams like a dinosaur in pain – very annoying indeed. Unintelligent media system and no inbuilt ports for USB and AUX; instead two long ugly looking wires remain entangled in the dashboard as if a function forged by an immature. Floor carpet is way inferior. Assembly of parts seems ostentatiously crude, unfinished and cheap.
Fuel economy: Very poor economy; 11.3 km/ltr. at the best.
Ride quality/ handling: hardest ever suspension, low quality tyres and alloy-rims make it a ride on ancient wooden cart.
Final words: Not only very disappointing but also a disgrace to Honda

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Honda Fit 1.5 Hybrid S Package User Review

excellent value of money with good fuel average

2015 Honda Fit 1.5 Hybrid S Package

Posted by Muhammad Umair Bukhari on Aug 04, 2022

Familiarity: I owned this car.

air dynamic shape that gives best fuel average.
interior is great ???????? looks small but its comfortable inside and with a powerful engine 1500cc.
ground clearance is low need little careful while driving on sped breaker.
fuel economy
gives 22 in summer and higher in winter
its a definitely value for money car

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

value for money car

2016 Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC

Posted by PWUser161735394724 on Aug 04, 2022

Familiarity: I owned this car.

looks amazing exterior nd interior design all good
but
fuel average very bad
city me 8.7
aur out of city 12.5 ke qareeb overall car is good suspension ok h or ac bbi fit h space bhi bht achi h agr hum yaris se compare kre toh yaris se behtr h space fuel economy h bs wase car achi h

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

value for money better than alsvin amd yaris

2022 Honda City 1.5L ASPIRE CVT

Posted by taqiabbas on Aug 03, 2022

Familiarity: I owned this car.

interior is the best amd boot space is better and has rear ac vents and value for money it has smart entry system push startcruise control sports modedrls and retectable mirror the thing that id missing thats sunroof and traction control and the car is complete and has rear power outlets

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Bad quality interior

2022 Honda City 1.5L ASPIRE CVT

Posted by Dr M Aslam on Aug 01, 2022

Familiarity: I owned this car.

The car is good but for this much price the quality of the interior is very bad everywhere cheap plastic ia used the window buttons are made of very cheap plastic and the dashboard and door panels also btw the space in the bach seats is more than enough its so spacious
features are also good
fuel average is very good
honda should use good quality soft touch material for the interior like they use in the civics

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Honda N Box 2Tone Color Style G Turbo Package User Review

Review for Honda N Box

2019 Honda N Box 2Tone Color Style G Turbo Package

Posted by Ahmad Mansoor on Jul 30, 2022

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Normal exterior
interior is best, AC is far better than Alto.
I am gonna give 100 marks on comfort and drive.
Car price is also managable as comapared to other cars .
Space for the people is also vast and seats are also very comfortable
fuel economy is good, I am getting 18-20 KM per litre in the city with heavy traffic and for the long route it covers around 22-23KM per litre.

Overall I am happy to own this car because I was going for a brand new Alto but someone gave me a suggestion to go for the japanese cars.
And I really find it worth it.

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Why Feature your Ad?

Honda Car Reviews

Recent Honda Car Reviews

Good buy but still lacks

Very bad fuel economy

Best Car

Civic turbo

Highly disappointing

excellent value of money with good fuel average

value for money car

value for money better than alsvin amd yaris

Bad quality interior

Review for Honda N Box

Get The PakWheels App

Cars By Make

Cars By City

Explore PakWheels

PakWheels.com

Cars by Category

Cars by Body Type

Cars by Color

Cars by Province

Sell On PakWheels

Download Mobile Apps

Why Feature your Ad?

Honda Car Reviews

Recent Honda Car Reviews

Create Quick Alerts

Safely Connect with Buyers

Save Your Favourite Ads

Enter Your Email

Let’s get you started!

Forgot your password?

Get The PakWheels App

Cars By Make

Cars By City

Explore PakWheels

PakWheels.com

Cars by Category

Cars by Body Type

Cars by Color

Cars by Province

Sell On PakWheels

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us