2016 nissan dayz pros or cons

2016 Nissan Dayz S

3/5

Posted by Abdul Rehman on Oct 18, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.

I have nissan dayz simple 2016 model. Exterior outclass. Bht zabrdast sitting capacity hai pichli sitting bht zayada hai luxury feeling ati hi.fuel avg in city 15-16 not bad with ac without ac long route
21- 22 avg jo me ne nikali hi abi tk.
sb se jo buri baat hai nissan dayz me iski pick ni achi overatake krte waqt bht tension hojati hai lekin gear k sth jo button hota use press krlo tu speed ka option ajata economy leaf chlee jate hai meter se or gari full power me ajati hi ?baki overall good car.

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Highly recommended

2012 Nissan Moco S

4/5

Posted by PWUser159580700026 on Jul 27, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Everything is perfect with this car only exterior shape isn't much stylish but not too bad rest everything is perfect, using since 2017 and still its like new, I change its engine oil, air filter and oil filter after 2200km. Highly recommended car for budget of 1 million.

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Nissan AD 2006

2006 Nissan AD Van 1.3 DX

3/5

Posted by Anonymous on Jun 15, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Exterior wise car is good and interior is also compared to other cars is good. in small budget good car for those who has a lot of laguage problems as Nissan AD van has a lot of trunk space. AC chilled, maintainanc wise every thing is available but little bit costly as the spare part imported from Japan and as per Dollar fluctuation spared also get high or low . fuel average is not good, the leg space for the passenger seat is not good anyhow justified. overall car is good. I purchased it in before one year but facing a engine missing problem and in Islamabad no one good mechanic found till date for solution of the problem. I think all the Nissan lovers have to make a plate form for general discussion of whatsapp regarding maintainance and other problems facing by nissan owners

any how car is good

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Nissan AD 2006

2006 Nissan AD Van 1.3 DX

2/5

Posted by Anonymous on May 12, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.

exterior is almost good, fuel average is not too good as compare with other cars of this generation, however, in the small budget you can get a good car, but whenever you want to purchased this car it may also be in your mind that the resale of this car is not too good and it will take time to resale.Nissan is the brand but unfortunately it can not maintain its business and its name in Pakistan and mostly people of Pakistan are not aware with the brand of Nissan and everyone in Pakistan preferred to take Toyota Corolla which is a popular all over in Pakistan.

presently i am facing engine missing problems in may nissan if any one has experience in this regard may please be shared with me on [email protected]

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Nissan Days Roox

2015 Nissan Dayz

4/5

Posted by Anonymous on Mar 19, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.

I have this car for last more than two years, My range was maximum 11 lacs so in that range i had two options, either go for locally assembled Wagon R or some imported 660CC car. I didn't prefer Wagon R as spending(11.5 lac + 50k Own) wasn't really worth when its not giving you few basic features like ABS breaks, Auto Windows and last but not the least, Automatic Transmission. with this brief info, Following are the Car's features:
Exterior: Just an ordinary one like any other imported Japenese 660CC cars, Gives somewhat a box like appearance to be precise.
Interior: Is extraordinary, would beat any other car or same price range with the cabin space it has, comfortable seating, have climate control feature as well.
Ride Quality & Handling: Ride quality is average, Handling is not so ideal at high speed and feels like it's losing stability in heavy winds and highways on high speeds.
Final Words: Given these much I features in the given price, I think i made best decision.

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Nissan march k11

1999 Nissan March Bolero

3/5

Posted by Anonymous on Jan 28, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Exterior: Its a 3 door hatch back. smaller then cultus and larger then alto.
Interior: grey dashboard, fully automatic wiper side mirrors are powered, ac heater , defoger every thing
fuel economy:9-10 in city 14-15 on hgwy (on 100)
Ride quality:better then mehran alto and all car on its league
Final words:best car for home use and for those who enjoy all in one in small car

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Value for money

2013 Nissan Moco S

4/5

Posted by WM Lahore on Dec 18, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Exterior is good and solid as compare to local one and interior is also very good and spacious.fuel average is very good 19 to 20 in city and 24 on long easily. Handling very good ground clearance super. Automatic gear AC is super good. This car is 100% value for money

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Nissan 510 BlueBird

1970 Nissan Blue Bird 1.8SSS

4/5

Posted by Anonymous on Jul 27, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.

The Datsun 510 was a series of the Datsun Bluebird sold from 1968 to 1973, and offered outside the U.S. and Canada as the Datsun 1600.

According to AutoWeek's G.D. Levy, the 510 has often been called the "poor man's BMW."

The 510's engineering was inspired by contemporary European sedans, particularly the 1966 BMW 1600-2 — incorporating a SOHC engine, MacPherson strut suspension in front and independent, semi-trailing arms in the back.[3] The styling is attributed to Datsun in-house designer, Teruo Uchino.[citation needed]

The engine was promoted by Nissan USA president Yutaka Katayama, a design developed through Prince, an acquisition.[4]

Launched in October 1967, body styles included a two-door sedan (1968), four-door sedan, five-door station wagon and two-door coupé (November 1968).

The 510 range became famous for Nissan's rallying successes outside Japan and paved the way for greater Nissan sales internationally.

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Nissan AD

2006 Nissan AD Van 1.3 DX

4/5

Posted by Alaas on Jul 01, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Not sure if my car is DX or GX.

Exterior is old fashioned but the car has solid body.

The interior material is of good quality but not luxurious. My car has manual windows/side mirrors. RPM meter is missing in all '06 models. Steering and headlights are adjustable. Handbrake is in good position (not exactly behind the gear). AC is good but the cabin is too big (as its trunk is not partitioned). So, cooling takes time in hot summers. Front seats have good leg space and are comfortable but leg space is too tight for rear seats (can be fixed but requires alteration in trunk). The front windshield is v. near to driver's head and so is the rear view mirror (but you get used to).

On local, fuel economy is 10km/l with AC and 11.5km/l without AC.
On long without AC is 14.0 to 14.5km/l. With AC around 12/l.

Ride quality and handling is very good; though the station wagon shape itself has some limitations.

Nice car for long term. Nissan Engines are durable and less costly.

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Nissan Dayz 2014 model

2014 Nissan Dayz J

3/5

Posted by Ali Ahmed on May 19, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Exterior: Out of all Japanese cars, i like this car's exterior design and Mira's the most. Most people will as well. It doesn't look like a carry dabba, it looks like a proper well build compact car.

Interior: Fantasting interior with tons of space to put your stuff in. Front seats are like cushion and there is good amount of space in backseats. However, there is no space to put a spare tyre in.

Fuel Economy: Super good i would say. In winters it's 18-22 km/l whereas 14-17 km/l in Summers with A/C.

Ride Quality and Handling: Reversing this car is difficult if you don't have a back camera. Also i don't know but i find it much difficult to drive compared to my Honda City, probably because of the long dashboard. I don't know, it just feels floaty and doesn't feels like you are in full control of car as much as a City probably due to acceleration. It's performance is excellent for a 600CC car and never troubles me.

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Why Feature your Ad?

Nissan Car Reviews

Recent Nissan Car Reviews

2016 nissan dayz pros or cons

Highly recommended

Nissan AD 2006

Nissan AD 2006

Nissan Days Roox

Nissan march k11

Value for money

Nissan 510 BlueBird

Nissan AD

Nissan Dayz 2014 model

Get The PakWheels App

Cars By Make

Cars By City

Explore PakWheels

PakWheels.com

Cars by Category

Cars by Body Type

Cars by Color

Cars by Province

Sell On PakWheels

Download Mobile Apps

Why Feature your Ad?

Nissan Car Reviews

Recent Nissan Car Reviews

Create Quick Alerts

Safely Connect with Buyers

Save Your Favourite Ads

Enter Your Email

Let’s get you started!

Forgot your password?

Get The PakWheels App

Cars By Make

Cars By City

Explore PakWheels

PakWheels.com

Cars by Category

Cars by Body Type

Cars by Color

Cars by Province

Sell On PakWheels

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us