Pakwheels

Suzuki Car Reviews

Overall Rating

517 Reviews | Write a Review
  • Style 3-rating
  • Comfort 3-rating
  • Fuel Economy 3-rating
  • Performance 3-rating
  • Value for Money 3-rating

Recent Suzuki Car Reviews

Sort By:
Displaying Reviews 1 - 10 of 517 in total
Suzuki Alto GII User Review

Excellent car

2007 Suzuki Alto GII

Posted by Anonymous on Jul 19, 2017

Familiarity: I owned this car.
exterior is good and perfect for 658 cc car and interior is comfortable and power steering gives smooth drive fuel economy is also good and air conditioning system works smooth and air bags make car more safe to drive shocks perfect ....... but price is 50000 high
  • Style 3-rating
  • Comfort 4-rating
  • Fuel Economy 5-rating
  • Performance 5-rating
  • Value for Money 3-rating
Suzuki Cultus User Review

Lack of cash

2017 Suzuki Cultus

Posted by Anonymous on Jul 15, 2017

Familiarity: I have neither owned nor driven this car.
It has very beautiful look and a loving interior as well. It has moderate engine and it gives a good mileage. I realy like this car and find it perfect for me But There is a little problem that I have not money to buy I have 460 in my pocket.When I shall be capable, I wil InshaAllah buy.:-)
  • Style 5-rating
  • Comfort 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy 5-rating
  • Performance 5-rating
  • Value for Money 5-rating
Suzuki Cultus User Review

suzuki cultus 2017

2017 Suzuki Cultus

Posted by Muhammad Irfan on Jul 09, 2017

Suzuki launched the 3rd generation of cultus in pakistan on 22nd April 2017. Suzuki Cultus revitalized the whole design framework of cultus and produced a more sophisticated and bolder cultus.This car was first unveiled in 'Auto Expo 2014' in india Later on ,it makes its way into 'Geneva Motor Show' in 2014.Globally it comes with the celerio name tag.Pak Suzuki launched Cultus considering the need of fuel efficient family car and growing trend of imported hatchbacks in the country.This car was launched in two variants vxr and vxl(top of the ... more
  • Style 5-rating
  • Comfort 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy 5-rating
  • Performance 5-rating
  • Value for Money 5-rating
Suzuki Wagon R VX User Review

ok

2017 Suzuki Wagon R VX

Posted by Anonymous on Jul 08, 2017

suzuki wagon r should be automatic. the traffic sittuation in cities is very bad so suzuki must thought about automatic transmissions. i am not satisfied . as you compare it with japneess wagon r its more comfortable and automatic with outer good shape.
  • Style 2-rating
  • Comfort 2-rating
  • Fuel Economy 3-rating
  • Performance 3-rating
  • Value for Money 2-rating
Suzuki Cultus VXL User Review

Not so bad car

2017 Suzuki Cultus VXL

Posted by Anonymous on Jul 07, 2017

Familiarity: I owned this car.
It has a simple interior with air bags for driver and side passenger both . It has 998 cc engine which give the average of 16 to 18 on city road and 20 on highway in my opinion the ca r's price very high it should be same as wagon r as it has same engine but the cultus has aloy rims and air bags which are cheaper if you want more detailing and features of the car visit the links it will surely clearify
  • Style 4-rating
  • Comfort 3-rating
  • Fuel Economy 5-rating
  • Performance 4-rating
  • Value for Money 1-rating
Suzuki Swift User Review

A Very Nice Car but

2017 Suzuki Swift

Posted by Anonymous on Jun 25, 2017

Familiarity: I owned this car.
As of being an owner of this car I'll glade to have this by my side.... interior wise it's nice, but the doors when you close them makes sounds cheap, the quality of interior is fine too,
Exterior wise it looks good, the aerodynamic shape is blazing....
Talking about the drive mood, it gave amazing road grip and comfortabilty for the driver, how ever fuel economy is poor, hardly it has given me 8-9 in city and 10-11 on highways....
  • Style 5-rating
  • Comfort 4-rating
  • Fuel Economy 2-rating
  • Performance 4-rating
  • Value for Money 3-rating
Suzuki FX GA User Review

fx a great car

1987 Suzuki FX GA

Posted by Anonymous on Jun 25, 2017

Familiarity: I did not own this car, but have driven this car.
exterior is tough
fuel economy is good
spare parts are cheap
tough car
great value for money
i have used a couple of these cars
i loved the experience
it's a great car
A great family car. its an amazing car. it is fun to drive. its a tough car that is why taxi drivers also use it
  • Style 3-rating
  • Comfort 2-rating
  • Fuel Economy 5-rating
  • Performance 3-rating
  • Value for Money 5-rating
Suzuki Mehran VXR Euro II User Review

same design and functions from 30 years

2017 Suzuki Mehran VXR Euro II

Posted by Anonymous on Jun 22, 2017

Familiarity: I did not own this car, but have driven this car.
exterior is ugly perfomance is very poor this car has same shape and functions from 1997-- 2017 no changes had been made build quality is very poor steering wheel is big and hard as much as a truck brakes are fail i would prefer to buy a japanese 660cc old model car rather than wasting your money on 2017 suzuki mehran even a richshaw is better than mehran
  • Style 1-rating
  • Comfort 1-rating
  • Fuel Economy 2-rating
  • Performance 1-rating
  • Value for Money 2-rating
Suzuki Cultus VXL User Review

Suzuki Cultus 2017

2017 Suzuki Cultus VXL

Posted by Hussain Raza on Jun 15, 2017

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Based on PAMA ( Pakistan Automobiles Manufacturing Association) data, 2,012 units have been sold till 31st May 2017 from the launch date and that is not just based on speculations .

Cultus has K-Series award winning engine that is considered to have mileage of 18-20 km/lr , much better than Swift (12-13 km/lr) whose engine is obsolete internationally all over.

Besides, all these facts, Suzuki's after sales maintenance is quite affordable than the imported cars in this category ( Vitz, Passo , Mirage etc.)

It might be ... more
  • Style 4-rating
  • Comfort 4-rating
  • Fuel Economy 5-rating
  • Performance 4-rating
  • Value for Money 4-rating
Suzuki Cultus VXL User Review

Best car in this price range

2017 Suzuki Cultus VXL

Posted by Muhammad Asad Noor on Jun 15, 2017

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Ride quality is better than city. Much better than city. more fuel efficient and very spacious inside. Safety features are comparable to International standards. People complaining thing plastic used inside don't understand that the car design is meant to be LIGHT. it supposed to have low weight.
  • Style 5-rating
  • Comfort 5-rating
  • Fuel Economy 5-rating
  • Performance 5-rating
  • Value for Money 5-rating