Pakwheels

Search Car Reviews

Explore user ratings and read opinions

Write Review

Share first hand experience of your car with other buyers.

Most Reviewed Cars

Recent Car Reviews

Sort By:
2761 - 2772 of 5302 Results
Honda Civic 1.8 i-VTEC CVT User Review

Best fuel avg

2017 Honda Civic 1.8 i-VTEC CVT

Posted by Sharjeel Anwar on Jun 27, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Reliability, i know people will criticize on this but I've 180,000kms on my car and have been driving it for 3 years now. There were some known faults like the battery issue. But the Honda centre dealership made sure to get the car in perfect condition. The fuel average is spectacular for a 1800cc (13-13.5 in city 14-15.5 on long). I'd definitely recommend to buy this car as it is value to money and way better than its competitors in the market.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI Exclusive Line  User Review

Great ride with efficiency

2017 Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI Exclusive Line

Posted by Hassan on Jun 27, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
An excellent ride with almost all trendy and desired features within the same variant without extra charges. Highly recommended for German SuV lovers who need not only exciting ride but also comfort , efficiency and amazing road grip . The very special feature about Q2 is that it’s extremely spacious and comfortable despite of its compact size.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Hyundai Santro User Review

Great car

2001 Hyundai Santro

Posted by awais on Jun 26, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
i have santro plus 2001 model. 100% car in original condition. like paint or interior 100% original. car is totally company fitted..
fuel average is amazing like 13 in city and long drive is 18 average... great car. i want to show my car so people know about this car.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Suzuki Alto VXR (CNG) User Review

Alto 2011

2011 Suzuki Alto VXR (CNG)

Posted by Muhammad Shayan on Jun 25, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
As good as a big car like any sedan, Ac Performance is good specialy in hot wether there is no heating or loading on engine. Front Lights are very gud. Dashboard and door inners are made from good plastic quality and give good shine aftr using polish. On highway little bit engine sound issue otherwise silent on speed under 80km / h. If we compare it with mehran than there is no match of both cars. Alto is best for small faimly and enough trunk space after removing CNG cylender.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Suzuki Cultus VXRi (CNG) User Review

Suzuki Cultus 2012 CNG

2012 Suzuki Cultus VXRi (CNG)

Posted by Anonymous on Jun 25, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Exterior wise car is perfectly fine!
Interior is also in perfect condition!
Its fuel economy is fine like 16-17 in city with AC and 18-19 on Long with AC!
Its Ride is full of comfort and joy!
I recommend this car to all salary holders because it is value for money and does not have any fault and in this price bracket it gives you and your family a comfortable life style!
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Toyota Corolla Altis Grande CVT-i 1.8 User Review

BEST OPTION IN 4 MILLION

2020 Toyota Corolla Altis Grande CVT-i 1.8

Posted by Shahroze Khan on Jun 23, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
I HAVE BOTH CIVIC X AND GRANDE BUT GRANDE IS FAR BETTER THEN CIVIC . BUILT QUALITY OF GRANDE IS MUCH SUPERIOR THAN CIVIC AND GRNADE ALSO WINS THE RACE IN FUEL AVERAGE ENGINE PERFORMANCE AND COMFORT. ONLY POINT WERE GRANDE IS A BIT BEHIND CIVIC IS THE EXTERIOR LOOK OF CIVIC IS ATTRACTIVE THAN GRANDE OTHERWISE GRANDE IS BEST OPTION IN 4 MILLION BUDGET
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Toyota Wish 1.8X User Review

The most Underrated car

2003 Toyota Wish 1.8X

Posted by Mudassar Latif on Jun 22, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Starting on with the exterior, the Toyota Wish has a very elegant and bold design and also a touch of sportiness as most of the Wish models are loaded with Factory fitted body kits. When it comes to styling, I personally like the Wish more than any fielder, probox, or airwave etc.
The interior is far better than any of this car's competitor; Be it a fielder, isis, airwave, the Fit shuttle hybrid and even the Brv! The car in topic-the X model-comes loaded with two front airbags-remember that airbags were a new and big thing in the early 2000's. Standard options include Automatic Climate Control and it is a 7 seater by nature! :D
The car is powered by a 1ZZ-FE-the same motor in your popular Toyota Altis(1790cc)- so parts are the least to worry about. Toyota's advertised power output is 140 bhp (142 PS; 104 kW) at 6,400 rpm and 127 lb?ft (172 N?m) of torque at 4,400 rpm. You see that power is not an issue here. It is more than sufficient for trips to Gilgit, Hunza.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC User Review

Excellent car

2016 Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC

Posted by PWUser156146563439 on Jun 21, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
fuel average is 17-19 km/l in city and 20-21 km/l on highway, its good car but i recommend you not to buy this because the 2020 is not same as 2016, 2020 is a worst model and 2016 is great. 2020 is not comfortable and 2016 is very comfortable. Interior dashboard quality is really great of 2016 but you can not put and sticky thing on dashboard of 2020.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC Prosmatec User Review

City 2019 vs City 2016

2019 Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC Prosmatec

Posted by PWUser156146563439 on Jun 21, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
i am having honda city 2019 and its fuel economy is only 9-10 km/l in city and 12-13 on highway a nd on the other hand i am having the same (Honda City 2016) which is a lot better than this, its fuel economy is 17-19 km/l in city and 20-21 on highway and the 2016 is more comfortable than 2019. 2019 is not even fast
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Suzuki Alto Lapin 10th Anniversary Limited User Review

a very goog and dashing car

2015 Suzuki Alto Lapin 10th Anniversary Limited

Posted by Muhammad faisal on Jun 21, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
exterior is too much good and cutest look
interior is dashing built quality is better then other 660 cc cars , luggage capacity is also good , seats are comfortable and good gap between rear and front passenger seats.
handling is Great and when someone drives. passenger doesn't felt he drives a small car
overall a very good car with economical fuel average of 25km/liter in city and 27kms/liter on highway drive
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Toyota Passo X User Review

excellent car

2013 Toyota Passo X

Posted by Mubashir Khan on Jun 20, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
What a intelligent car such a like little corolla
great pick and best car
Fuel economy is good1000cc best category car
this is good car for long trip and and very interesting thing this is Japanese car you can put at for your family very very very good car
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
DFSK Glory 580 1.5 CVT User Review

best value for your money

2020 DFSK Glory 580 1.5 CVT

Posted by Ali Hammad on Jun 19, 2020

Familiarity: I owned this car.
I'm glad I got this car. It's a great vehicle for families. The build is awesome, rivals even the best Japanese counterparts. Interestingly this turbo has no issue with fuel quality unlike few big name lifafa brands :) I've also found that most of the buyers of this car are very highly educated.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money

Get The PakWheels App

Buy & Sell Cars, Bikes and Auto Parts faster and better
using our App

Scan the QR
to get the App

Subscribe to our push notifications for the latest news & updates