Pakwheels

Search Car Reviews

Explore user ratings and read opinions

Write Review

Share first hand experience of your car with other buyers.

Most Reviewed Cars

Recent Car Reviews

Sort By:
3553 - 3564 of 5342 Results
Suzuki Ciaz Automatic User Review

Bitter Sweet Experience

2018 Suzuki Ciaz Automatic

Posted by Anonymous on Feb 07, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Yes it is a 'Suzuki' & yes it costs over 2MPKR. Handling could be a lot better, the car lacks good road grip & often skids on highways on windy days.

Now to the good part.

Looks of this car are better than most, probably its best feature. Fuel economy is good even on bad days, you can get an average of 15km/l (or better) on the automatic variant, like the one I am using. Trunk is very spacious. Ride is fairly comfortable, I've driven it continuously for 600km without much trouble. Pick up is good & tops out at 190km/hr, but you can probably take it further.

Overall good car, a few additional features like fog lights & multimedia with rear camera, a sunroof & auto folding side mirrors with turn indication lights can make it worth your hard earned bucks.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC User Review

Sasti aur tikao Sedan with good Fuel Average

2018 Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC

Posted by Aleem Razzaq on Feb 07, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Exterior Looks good but quality isn't as good it should be.
Interior build quality very poor
Fuel Average is quite good, I just recently had tour on mountain areas it gave me an average 15.9KM/L, hmmm Impressed!!
On Long tour I chooses GT Road so bcoz of manual I got Tired
My Final Words are It good sedan If you compare with Local Cars at this price but Quality Quality need to improve and Air bag should be installed.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Suzuki Cultus VXL User Review

Suzuki Cultus VXL 2019 review

2019 Suzuki Cultus VXL

Posted by Anonymous on Feb 06, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
The exterior of the car is good and in the in the interior comfort is good but on rear it is not more comfortable according to me the fuel average of car is good mine is giving 25.5km/l it (it depends on your driving style) it is provided with ABS (Anti lock braking system) only in (VXL & AGS) due to ABS brakes are good it also have Dual Airbags (only in VXL & AGS) one for driver and one for front passenger.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Suzuki Alto VXR (CNG) User Review

Best CNG fuel econonmy car

2012 Suzuki Alto VXR (CNG)

Posted by Muhammad Khalil on Feb 05, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Car is best for small family with amazing fuel economy on CNG but pathetic on fuel that average on 9-12 but on CNG its almost more than double from petrol.... But trunk space is compromised if you go with a CNG option but if you can manage then it worth i.....Comfort is not very state of art but better than many others iron drums like mehran and other overated and overpriced cars... Exterior and interior is just ok for an economy sector car....Value for money is good and resale of good condition car is very good
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
United Bravo Base Grade  User Review

Bravo review

2019 United Bravo Base Grade

Posted by Muhammad Zia Ur Rehman on Feb 03, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
looking stylesh, but following deficiencies observed, No spare tyre and also no place for spare tyre, No ABS brake, doors are not shut softely, back seat very uncomfotabel and space between front seats is very much thin price is about 965 thousands, interior justified value to price
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda BR-V i-VTEC MT User Review

Loving my new Honda BRV

2019 Honda BR-V i-VTEC MT

Posted by Zeeshan on Feb 01, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Since it was launched in 2017 i wanted to buy Honda BRV because of its shape and design .
But because i heard that its fuel average is not very good i waited and took feed back from my friends and family.
To my utmost surprise my Honda BRv Manual is giving 14.8 km/l in city and 16.5 on highway. I heard that average of manual BRV is better and it is confirmed now thats why i choose MT variant .
Its a family car , kids love the space and modern interior it offers.
It gives a "shashka " look as well.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Toyota Corolla Altis CVT-i 1.8 User Review

Not very good brake

2015 Toyota Corolla Altis CVT-i 1.8

Posted by Fazal Rehman on Feb 01, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
this car is very good i have been driving it from 2 years and it is a good experience but it is not good in braking.
fuel average is 14.1 and i am shocked it is very good in fuel average.
Honda civic fuel average is maximun 10 and it is not acceptable.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Suzuki Liana RXi (CNG) User Review

Great car I have never seen this type of luxurious and comfortable car at this price

2007 Suzuki Liana RXi (CNG)

Posted by Muhammad Faheem on Jan 31, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
The exterior is also good with front grill and fog lights its look unique and the trunk is also in a good shape,there is a good inner space for 5 person in city with comfort but the main thing is money and from my experience there is not still any car with this all function at this price if there is so let me know please
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Suzuki Cultus VXL User Review

Interior quality not good

2018 Suzuki Cultus VXL

Posted by Pakwheels User on Jan 30, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
I purchased my caltus in start of 2018 and now it's 2019 I did not have any engine issues with this car.but I really dislike the interior quality because there is sound of chu chu every where and suspension is not good there is lot of noise on bad roads.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC User Review

Neither Impressed nor Disappointed

2019 Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC

Posted by Sharjeel Mahmood on Jan 25, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
I received my car on the 15th of January 2019. Was booked in August 2018 so took 6 months to deliver.

Talking about the vehicle, my first thoughts were positive since this was the first sedan car I ever bought. I got a Suzuki Mehran in 2008 and then Suzuki Swift DLX in 2011. The main objective of considering Honda City was the fact that it was the cheapest Value-for-Money sedan on offer by domestic manufacturers. The car turned out to be an average car since the prices for a decent car are now way above the price of Honda City. Some serious omissions are Alloy Wheels, Fog Lamps, Rear Speakers, Dash-Clock, Imported Tyres and Central-locking Button. Even the Immobilizer isn't embedded in the key. All of these were things that were present in the Swift as stock equipment. Fuel Average of Honda City is pretty okay. 13.5-14.5 km/l is what I have averaged so far. Overall a good buy. Build quality however needs improvement. Other than that, I guess it justifies its price.
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Honda Civic Oriel 1.8 i-VTEC CVT User Review

Splendid and glorious

2018 Honda Civic Oriel 1.8 i-VTEC CVT

Posted by Shaheryar Hafeez on Jan 23, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Let me start off by saying what a buy!was initially worried due to people constantly complaining about poor quality and performance.However I am truly impressed by the experience and have to say that it's a step towards excellence. I have faced no build quality issues(looks like they have been resolved in later models)and I am astounded by the sheer beauty of the interior. The front passenger seat is a little bit uncomfortable but all others are extremely pleasant and offer great relaxation.The performance in my opinion is satisfactory. Yes, initial torque is not too good but it is extremely smooth and agile on higher speeds,and has much better grip compared to its competitor.The ground clearance is good but not optimal yet it is good enough to pass speed breakers even on full load.Turning on high speeds and braking is awesome.Yes, options like navigation and leather seats are expensive and should have Come as a standard.Would end it by saying WHAT AN EXCITING CAR
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money
Suzuki Alto F User Review

Suzuki Alto JDM 2015 review

2015 Suzuki Alto F

Posted by Anonymous on Jan 23, 2019

Familiarity: I owned this car.
Exterior: Very stylish front but a little ugly from the back due to tail lights being on the bumper.
Interior: Driver seat is electronically heated. 4 speakers with decent sound quality. Basic deck with CD player and AUX. Rear camera, TFT, Digital Climate Control and Push start is only offered in the X variant which is top of the line for JDM Alto. Side Mirrors are neither auto adjustable nor retractable. Overall build quality is good.
Features and Safety: 2 Air Bags, ABS brakes, Traction Control, Eco Idle, ENE charge technology, Electric Power steering, Power mirrors.
Performance: Very good pick and acceleration. 0-100 in about 14 seconds. Considerably soft suspension (8/10). Ground clearance is better than most other 660 cc cars. Car does not vibrate up till 120 kph. Overall, a very smooth drive.
Comfort: Very decent head room and leg room. Seat cushioning is decent. A comfortable car for 4 people.
Fuel economy: 17-20 in city, 22-25 on highway
Rating: 8.5/10
  • Style
  • Comfort
  • Fuel Economy
  • Performance
  • Value for Money

Get The PakWheels App

Buy & Sell Cars, Bikes and Auto Parts faster and better
using our App

Scan the QR
to get the App

Subscribe to our push notifications for the latest news & updates