Toyota Land Cruiser ZX 60th Black Leather Selection User Review

Value to money

2012 Toyota Land Cruiser ZX 60th Black Leather Selection

4/5

Posted by Hasnaat on Nov 20, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Hi,

Pros: Exterior is very beautiful and gives a heavy look. No need to facelift this model because its already a masterpiece. Interior is outclass no words to describe it. Suspension is superior. Ground clearance mashallah superb. Side profile of car with its stock rims looks amazing.

Cons: Fuel consumption is too much. Local with ac 3km/l and without ac 4km/l on highway got no more than 6km/l. Price is a bit too much. The diesel varient is better at off-roading than the petrol because the diesel has more torque.

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Good

2020 Prince Pearl MT

4/5

Posted by Imtiaz Ahmad on Nov 20, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

the car is almost Good because i use it from since 6 ,7 Months ... and using for long travel like from Islamabad to swat and also used locally in swat too but almost Good not bad ...fuel is normal consumption not very high the boday is looks good and strong. a little bits small issue i facing so the company is resolved it.... Almost its a Good car in low budget

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Excellent value for Money

2014 Suzuki Wagon R VXL

4/5

Posted by on Nov 19, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

I bought Wagon R VXL in 2014 when it was launched. To be frank, at that time and at that price range 1090k it was the best car in that range. It's been more than 7 years I've been driving this car now, and I can say with confidence that it was the best decision i made. Still sfter 7 years of driving, it gives 14-15km mileage in city (with AC) it's AC is outstanding, maintenance cost is as low as 3-3.5k even now after 7years. O haven't changed anything till now in my Wagon R agyer 7 years of driving. All things still intact and working perfectly. That shows its really worth the money. Now it prices upto 2 million which i believe is unjustified, but when i bought it was 1 Million, and was totally worth it.

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Toyota Yaris Sedan ATIV MT 1.3 User Review

Awesome car in this budget

2021 Toyota Yaris Sedan ATIV MT 1.3

3/5

Posted by LEGEND AAZMEER on Nov 17, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Exterior is good not very good but good.The height of the dashboard is very high to my surprise.we can't see the bonnet.the acceleration is minimal.the car gives you a big margin for performance without AC.The interior is superb designed.Fuel average is Awesome.gives 15 in city and 17/18 on long at a speed of 120.value for money.you can choose this.

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Excellent Sedan

2021 Hyundai Elantra GLS

5/5

Posted by haider ali on Nov 17, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Very stylish exterior and top class build quality. The 2000 CC engine gives better fuel economy than Grande and Civic, I get 12 -13 with AC in the city under high rush traffic conditions and 15 to 16 in the city driving on the canal road . The interior is made up of good quality material. You cannot smell the cheap plastic smell inside the new car as is the case with Corolla. Front camera, Parking sensors and adaptive cruise control could make this car un-matchable in this segment.
Good value for money.

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Great

2018 Suzuki Wagon R VXL

4/5

Posted by Hasnaat on Nov 17, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Hi,

Exterior: It Looks ok but the build quality i A+. Very strong body. Shape looks a bit odd but it works. Ground clearance is good.

Interior: Build quality is good according to how much i bought it for. (12.5 lacs) in 2018.
Rear leg room and head room is good. Very spacious car.

Fuel average: In local with AC 13km/l and without AC 14km/l. On a motorway run it gave me 16-17km/l on speed of 100 km/h.
So, Fuel economy is good. 1000cc Engine can take you mostly anywhere.

Final Words: Wagon R is a good car. Value to money. Vey good car for local uses and easy to maintain. Parts are available from anywhere.

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Excellent Value for money

2007 Nissan AD Van 1.3 DX

4/5

Posted by Arif on Nov 17, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

I have this car for 5 yeafts Exterior is good and simple if you want to touch up work it will be easy with this type of body. Having very strong body even bumpers are also to strong. Interior is also good. Ac and heater is so good. Passenger space is less with leg room but acceptable But too much space in back you can fold passenger seat and find too big space in back even there can 3 adults sleep easily. I have done country tours 3 times with my family runs very good with good road grip fuel average is Ok but not too good it gives 12-13 on highways and 8-10 in city. All parts available but sometime it takes time to find in other cities. Finally in my opinion there is no car in Pakistan at this price with lot of utilities

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

best car after a long while

2020 FAW V2 VCT-i

4/5

Posted by Malik Qasim on Nov 16, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

hands on better than alto 20, cultus 2018, city 2016, swift 2016, used these cars but no quality and comfort .this car is solid built and power mashallah more than all above cars used em for more than 1 to 2 years each. Only backdrop is less market value .other than that best quality in terms of safety and comfort can imagine its quality by simply checking its doors have crush bars embedded in them.

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Not the best and not the worst

2020 DFSK Glory 580 1.5 CVT

4/5

Posted by Hasnaat on Nov 16, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Hi,

Pros: Exterior design is beautiful. Car has better road presence than Br-v. Fuel economy is good considering the cars weight and size. Local with ac 8-9km/l and without ac local 10km/l. Motorway run can get you easily 13km/l. Biggest Plus point is that it is 7 seater. Ac performance is good. 0-100 is 10 seconds. Ground clearance is very amazing.

Cons: Parts are not available. Interior needs to be improved. Brakes are very jerky. Car struggles for traction in places where an alto can go. Suspension is a bit stiff. Rear seats feel like wooden planks. Booking time is very long and on is a lot.

Conclusion: If you want 7 seater dont go Br-v raise your budget a bit and buy this. Its probably the best 7 seater out ther under 5 million. You wont regeret it.

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Average

2021 Suzuki Alto VXR

3/5

Posted by Hasnaat on Nov 16, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Hi,

Pros: Fuel average is amazing Local 19-23km/l and long probably 24km/l.
Ver easy to manuever in local. Ground clearance is very good. Running costs are low. Parts are easily available.

Cons: Build quality is Very very low. Could be improved. Paint quality is not good. Booking Time and on is too much. 3-4 Month booking time or 1.5-2 lac on. Seats are not comfortable. Car is not sound proofed.

Conclusion: Very good car if you want car for local uses. Alto vxr could be improved but it is just average. This car wont be heavy on your pocket. You wont love it but you wont regret it either.

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Good value for Money

2021 Suzuki Alto VXR

4/5

Posted by PWUser163700017813 on Nov 15, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

Pros: Exterior is ok, interior quality is much better as compared to previous Suzuki budget cars. Front seat comfort is very good however back seats are compromise. Drive,Ac, fuel economy is good. Cons: Gear shifting is not smooth Brakes also needs further improvement. Fuel lid opener is very fragile.

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC Prosmatec User Review

worse car

2021 Honda City 1.3 i-VTEC Prosmatec

2/5

Posted by CH Imran Iqbal on Nov 15, 2021

Familiarity: I owned this car.

exterior of honda city is worse.....and the built quality is so bad...and the road grip is also not too good.....and the fuel economy is also not too good..i drive my car very slowly...and the fuel average that i get in city is 8...9 and in long i get 10 to 11....this car is so bad....i didn't expected this type of bad car by honda.....Honda need to improve their build quality.....this car is too much expensive as compared to toyota 1.3 auto ......the toyota gives better fuel average and the suspension is also good.....i will advise you to buy toyota corolla....than this worse car....

More

Style
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Performance
Value for Money

Why Feature your Ad?

Search Car Reviews

Most Reviewed Cars

Toyota Corolla

Honda City

Honda Civic

Suzuki Cultus

Recent Car Reviews

Value to money

Good

Excellent value for Money

Awesome car in this budget

Excellent Sedan

Great

Excellent Value for money

best car after a long while

Not the best and not the worst

Average

Good value for Money

worse car

Get The PakWheels App

Cars By Make

Cars By City

Explore PakWheels

PakWheels.com

Cars by Category

Cars by Body Type

Cars by Color

Cars by Province

Sell On PakWheels

Download Mobile Apps

Why Feature your Ad?

Search Car Reviews

Most Reviewed Cars

Toyota Corolla

Honda City

Honda Civic

Suzuki Cultus

Recent Car Reviews

Create Quick Alerts

Safely Connect with Buyers

Save Your Favourite Ads

Enter Your Email

Let’s get you started!

Forgot your password?

Get The PakWheels App

Cars By Make

Cars By City

Explore PakWheels

PakWheels.com

Cars by Category

Cars by Body Type

Cars by Color

Cars by Province

Sell On PakWheels

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us