Hypothetical Scenario: What If Pakistan Bans Petrol Cars And Adopts Hybrid Cars Only Policy?

Hybrid Cars Pakistan

Pakistan has been blessed with all kinds of natural resources yet we have an ongoing Energy Crisis in the country, which amplified after the recent petrol crisis. There is no doubt that this is all because of the corrupt politicians and incompetent administration.

Oil is one of the natural resources that Pakistan is self-sufficient in. On July 2013, Pakistan’s production of oil stood at 68,000 bpd (barrels per day ), as of now it stands around 100,000 bpd, and in one or two years, it is expected to rise to around 130,000 bpd. This should come as no surprise as Pakistan has considerable oil reserves, while our current consumption is close 450,000 bpd.

In the years to come, our consumption will increase at a higher rate than our oil production. This is a huge problem for a debt ridden country like ours. Pakistan’s oil imports constitutes 36% of total import bill, the numbers go into billions and will only increase in the current situation. So how do we address the problem?

I believe that government’s Hybrid-only policy can be the answer, even if it solves the problem partially. If implemented, at best it could decrease the import bill and if not it could at the least keep the oil imports at current figures rather than the inevitable rise in oil imports. Let me delve further into the matter.

The average consumption of our locally assembled cars is around 10km/liter.
The Hybrid technology available right now can easily achieve 20km/liter. Let’s do the math on how much we can save compared to a conventional car.

We will take the example of a Toyota Prius. Toyota provides warranty of the Hybrid battery for up to 160,000km (100,000 miles). These batteries have a failure rate of 1%

160,000km/10 km per liter = 16,000 liters needed to travel 160,000 km in a conventional car.
160,000km/20 km per liter = 8,000 liters needed to travel 160,000 km in a hybrid car.

(16000-8000 liters) x 78 rs (current petrol prices,even though it is bound to increase eventually) = Rs. 624,000 saving for a normal consumer, the government of course saves expenditure of 8000 liters.

Now the question arises whether this policy is practical or not. Even though, we are unfortunate to have only 3 automakers in Pakistan, but still our luck didn’t run out completely. The international counter parts of the 3 automakers in Pakistan do produce Hybrid cars globally. Toyota is a market leader in Hybrid sales, Honda is doing all it can to catch Toyota, and even Suzuki produces Hybrid cars in Japan. The point being that Hybrid Technology is accessible to our local manufactures.

Another part of this policy should be to force the manufactures to increase localization (in other words turn the assemblers into manufactures) so that the prices of Hybrid cars can be brought down. The cheapest hybrid cars available in international markets are Toyota Prius C and Honda Fit which cost $24,000 (around PKR 2.5m) and $22,700 (around PKR 2.3m) respectively. By increasing localization, we could be able to bring down these prices through labor cost arbitrage and no C&F.

Let’s look at the economics of it if by localization we bring the prices of these cars by Rs. 200,000:
Toyota XLi: Price + fuel bill for traveling 160,000 km
Toyota XLi: 1,645,000 + 1,248,000 = Rs. 2,893,00

Honda Fit: Price + fuel bill for travelling 160,000 km
Honda Fit: 2,070,000 + 645,000 = Rs. 2,715,000

As we can see that by just by increasing localization the deal is still not that tempting. So our policy makers need to waive off the taxes for hybrid cars.

Hypothetical Price in Best Case Scenario:
=Honda Fit Price-Money Saved through Localisation-Tax Exemption
=2,270,000-200,000-250,000
=Rs. 1,830,000

Our government’s decision to go ahead with this policy should not be only based on the decision of waiving of the Sales Tax vs. Saving 8000 liters of expenditure but on others factors as well, such as increased localization means more employment, saving foreign exchange of imported parts (as most parts are imported in the current policy), public satisfaction because of lower fuel bills and policies that finally favor the public.

Here’s a list of Hybrid cars that current local manufactures can easily make in Pakistan:

Toyota: Prius, Aqua, Prius Alpha, Camry Hybrid, Corrolla Axio Hybrid, Avalon Hybrid.
Honda: CR-Z, Fit, Civic Hybrid, Accord Hybrid, Vezel, Insight.
Suzuki: Landy (currently the only Hybrid made in Japan but as they have the technology they could transfer it to other models like Swift).

I believe the authorities should go ahead with this policy. If this policy is not acceptable then some changes are absolutely needed to be made to turn around the abysmal state of our auto industry, for example just by blaming imported cars for the recent failure of Wagon R won’t do anything positive. Changes need to be made for the collective benefit of all the stakeholders.

  • Saeed Ahmed

    Nice review of hybrid technology, i feel we should think more advanced like total electric cars because till our slow govt decides to buy hybrid only, world will be running aircrafts on electricity by that time.

  • Alil

    It is an interesting thought however, your basis is full of flaws:

    1) Manufacturer globally are switching from Hybrid to Plug-in-Hybrid. Further diesel engines today, as sometimes more fuel efficient than Hybrid drivetrains. Petrol or diesel engines will remain the most important sources of tractive power in the automobile for the foreseeable future.

    2) Why not switch to ultra-lightweight construction technology. A modern car with components made of aluminum can be 24 percent lighter than one with components made of steel, which also allows fuel consumption to be reduced by 2 liters per 100 kilometers.

    3) Hybrids as a rule don’t handle as well as conventionally-powered vehicles. The reason for this is centered around the issue of weight.

    4) The price difference of hybrid cars versus standard vehicles is considerable.

    5) Hybrid vehicles also cost more to repair because of the complexity of the dual compulsion system used in most hybrid vehicles. The average maintenance bill will also go up, as the local dealer will have to install and high-voltage bay, and special training for mechanics.

    6) Local assembly, deletion program, etc. The most expensive part in a hybrid is the power generation, which is some vehicles is almost 1/3. We don’t have the technology here. Plus Hybrids are usually built on Aluminum Hybrid construction; we don’t have aluminum in this country.

  • Bilal Qureshi

    Interesting thoughts. It’s a topic worth pondering.
    It’s worth noting that the car ownership rate in Pakistan is just 5.7%- that’s 57 car owners per 1000 people. And this is total ownership, not new sales. That’s a VERY small number of potential buyers, and penetration rate for hybrid car sales is only going to decrease once you increase the purchase price. So it’s counter-intuitive, even if the government reduces sales taxes on luxury goods (which they shouldn’t).

    In order to reduce a nation’s overall energy import bill, you need to establish public transport, AND get people to use it. And I realize the thought of public transport makes everyone cringe, but it’s the most effective solution to reduce overall energy usage. It’s simply unsustainable for a fledging nation to afford every adult taking one car to work, not carpooling, driving longer distances, and burning through energy at the current rate. If you take a few thousand cars off the road in every major city every day for a year by getting the working population SIMPLY onto buses (forget the light rail system for now), your energy usage will go down.

    Hybrids are a very expensive alternative for a few handpicked buyers- less than a percent of the population. You need to solve the transportation problem for a few million, and that takes a big solution. Buses are a pretty big solution.

  • Tausif | توصیف

    Agreed. Govt. Should focus on public transport system. That will save much more then this hybrid only policy.

    One more point that we have too much motor cycles those also consuming fuel. This issue also can be address by making your public transport better.

    But sadly we always looks for short term solutions.

  • Bilal Qureshi

    I personally think motorcycles, though still use fuel, at least consume less fuel per person. However, agreed- a working public transportation system will reduce energy consumption more than any other alternative.

Top